Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

[bmah]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Justin asked my opinion on a separate thread, and I wasn't sure how effective it would be to redirect traffic and arguments. But if you want, you can certainly make one yourself and hope that people will post in the respective threads.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

As long as people explain where to have these arguments I don't see the issue. If someone is calling BS, <insert link to justin's bs thread here> go there and argue.

Maybe even have a list on the OP as to who is calling who bs and what is confirmed and what isn't. Simple really.

[justin_ator]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

I'll make it then, and we'll see how it goes.

[One Winged Angel]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Aren't suspicious scores just scores that could potentially be bs?

Unless you intend to create a thread where people don't sugar coat anything and just straight up call bullshit on players. But without any hard evidence, it's still just a suspicion. The thread would ultimately serve the same purpose as this one.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Thanks OWA. You killed it.

[psychoangel691]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Okay well when scores don't get taken care of because they're not going where they belong I don't want to hear all the complaining. With two threads it's just going to be more confusing.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Okay, I got it. Everyone is BS unless your Rubix. Okay, wipe everyone's scores.

[justin_ator]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Typed up a nice OP, came back and read this, guess we'll just continue the bs calls in here. Proceed as you were, citizens.


EDIT:

Aren't suspicious scores just scores that could potentially be bs?

Unless you intend to create a thread where people don't sugar coat anything and just straight up call bullshit on players. But without any hard evidence, it's still just a suspicion. The thread would ultimately serve the same purpose as this one.

I see your point, but at the same time Kayla talks about it like she doesn't want any discussion on the topic in here. The thread I would be making would be solely for discussing legitimacy of players who have been on the site long enough to not just be random botting faces, people who have a plethora of legitimate scores but maybe a bs score on one or two songs (such as Mina's RATO or ssbmchamp's Eclipse (Solar) scores). A RATO AAA on an account a week old is something you would report in this thread, an account that looks like an alt AAA'ing a bunch of 12s is something you would report in this thread. The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

[psychoangel691]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

I see your point, but at the same time Kayla talks about it like she doesn't want any discussion on the topic in here. The thread I would be making would be solely for discussing legitimacy of players who have been on the site long enough to not just be random botting faces, people who have a plethora of legitimate scores but maybe a bs score on one or two songs (such as Mina's RATO or ssbmchamp's Eclipse (Solar) scores). A RATO AAA on an account a week old is something you would report in this thread, an account that looks like an alt AAA'ing a bunch of 12s is something you would report in this thread. The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

When did I ever say I didn't want ANY discussion on the topic. I don't want the flaming/arguing that goes on which in turn brings in people posting things completely irrelevant (popcorn gif, etc) I want people to bring other evidence for or against the call, as long as it actually supports it one way or another and isn't just "oh you're dumb or you're dossar" Don't put words in my mouth.

On another note this should be up to date now (I hope I didn't miss anything) I have the ones that you guys were suspicious of because of the large amount of gameplays/grandtotal up under accounts to look into because I'm not too sure what to think of those.

[Oni-Paranoia]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

And here we have this thread to discuss someones legitimacy over what scores are "suspicious."

I don't think you can make another thread and expect it to run any smoother (or rougher) than this one.

[justin_ator]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

Alright, sorry Kayla, misinterpreted your statements of cluttering the thread as debating legitimacy rather than what you meant, wasn't trying to put words in your mouth.

Oni, I wasn't really hoping that that thread go any differently, the whole point to me for making that thread would be to shift the discussions and arguments elsewhere so we weren't cluttering this thread with them. If that doesn't matter, then the thread is irrelevant and the conversations can stay here.

I'm dropping the idea now, although I don't really see any potential harm from it regardless.

[i love you]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

This thread is more then enough for anything that has to do with BS scores or anything "suspicious" in general no matter how long the member has had their account for. If someone gets called out, we could check to see if their replays is frame perfect. If their replays is NOT frame perfect then there is a REALLY high chance that the person is legitimate unless proven otherwise. Just removing a score without proving ANYTHING is just not cutting it by the way. You don't just remove someone's score just because people assumes that it is BS. (Referring to Mina's RATO score)

And another thing, how exactly is that thread of yours going to work in the long run if you were to make it? What kind of tools or evidence would you be using when checking on those players that gets mentioned in your thread? It seems like to me that you are not really thinking this over. Once that thread is made, I can almost guarantee you that nearly 99% of replay scores posted there will all be legitimate. There is no way that anyone will be able to check every single replay of every player to see if one or two scores are BS or not. It is better to look at it in a bigger picture, if you think someone's score is botted or hacked, just post it here like always and we can at least check to see if their replay is frame perfect or not.

I just wanted to say something because I am bored and that I think your thread would have been pointless.

[justin_ator]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

I'm dropping the idea now

...moving on now

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

No more Mina RATO discussion until he makes a video. None of you have any idea as to what kind of pattern flexibility that file requires for a score like that (and not being framer perfect doesn't mean anything when I could see what was going on in the data) and until it is proven there is absolutely good reason to remove it.

Man, I even said to drop the Mina thing because it's beating a dead horse. No more of it.

[i love you]

Re: Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

although I don't really see any potential harm from it regardless.

That is why I said what I said. I was just wondering how it would work out.

But yeah, back on topic