If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

[MixMasterLar]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

/thread. Dev pretty much explained it the best

1, v, p, numpad6 spread or something.

rofl I might try that later.

But I rather see someone pass a tricky song with their teeth

[-Yukari-]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

That was great devonin

[robertsona]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

lock NAO.

[Xiaounlimited]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

you can elect to hit those buttons with any combination of fingers or other bodyparts

That's kind of hot.

[omgitznpv]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

lock NAO.

...

That's all I have to say.

[Goldenwind]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

Index has a distinct advantage over 1-finger. Index must be cheating.

1-finger has a distinct advantage over elbow-only. 1-finger must be cheating.

Jokes aside, the reason double-setup is typically not allowed is because one can hit one key with two fingers. Personally, I've never truly seen the logic behind banning it, especially in FFR where by default there are 8 keys you can use, but that's the rule, so yeah.

I didn't state that spread was cheating, I asked why it wasn't. Specifically, I asked why the line between cheating and not was drawn where it is. An acceptable answer to this was given before you posted, so technically this thread is done with.

Spread ≠ Double Setup

/end

Cat is an animal
Dog ≠ Cat
Therefore Dog ≠ Animal

Yay for bad logic.
Thread is already solved, by the way. -.-;

I'm pretty sure this post obliterated the competition.

It might've if the competition was still competing. Beating a dead horse -.-

Which style you choose to use within that guideline is entirely your own choice, and picking one that is "harder" doesn't make your mediocre score suddenly good or worthy of extra admiration.

I wasn't looking for pity, I wasn't trying to show off, I stated how spread has an advantage over index to display parallelism to how double-setup has an advantage over spread, making it a similar scenario, then asking why we chose one advantage to be cheating, and one not.

Yuk. I think you just made it clear that you use DS...

This will definetly hurt you seeing you got all of them good scores.

I also made it clear that despite using 8 possible keys, I'm actually at more of a disadvantage than a spread player. I don't see anyone in their right minds finding an issue with that, besides maybe jealousy (However anyone who can do anything about it is already better than me anyway, so...)

lock NAO.

Agreed. This thread was solved on Page 1, by Fant. Lock before more people get defendant of their playstyles -.-

[boondocks77]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

IIRC, Rubix used double when he passed Vrofl. Therefore it must fair. [/logical fallacy]

Next time please use your head when making facts:
Rubix used double setup as an exception to the rule, seeing as vrofl was unpassable without such measures. Double setup isn't allowed, Rubix is an exception to many things, don't involve him in this.

[Goldenwind]

Re: If double-setup isn't allowed, why is spread?

Next time please use your head when making facts:
Rubix used double setup as an exception to the rule, seeing as vrofl was unpassable without such measures. Double setup isn't allowed, Rubix is an exception to many things, don't involve him in this.

"A logical fallacy is a component of an argument which, being demonstrably flawed in its logic or form, renders the argument invalid in whole."