Fleeting Ecstasy :: FFR Batch Submission
mi40 - Fleeting Ecstasy - chthonic [7.5 / 10]
Jan/Feb 2022
PublicEvents
Rejected
Song Title: Fleeting Ecstasy
Song Author: chthonic
Step Author: mi40

Permissions: Blanket

Simfile Folder Name

Fleeting Ecstasy (mi40)

Note Count

325

Chart Length

1:42

Average NPS

3.3866

Estimated Difficulty

19.32

First Note

0:06

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -39

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 0

Jumps

x 6

Hands

x 0

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
4 - 12.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
6 - 12.00 nps 1 Second
10 - 10.00 nps 2 Seconds
16 - 8.00 nps 5 Seconds
27 - 5.40 nps 10 Seconds
48 - 4.80 nps 30 Seconds
120 - 4.00 nps 1 Minute
208 - 3.47 nps

Color Count

x 111 (34.15%)
x 113 (34.77%)
x 0 (0%)
x 101 (31.08%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.67s1.67s1.43s1.43s1.43s1.43s1.43s1.43s
35
28
21
14
7

[7.5/10] Change Recommended.

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Sync: good

- 13.525: I would include this note since the bass starts here.
- 20.489: I don't think it would be too much of a spike to include this note.
- 40.191 - 40.549: PR on these notes could be better.
- 47.810: Same here
- 61.977: This feels wrong as a 16th, I think there should be two 24th notes after the 8th.
- 66.799, 67.156: Not a fan of the omission of the 32nd notes in the saxophone solo and the absence of these notes in particular just feels off to me.

Very solid chart, the chart pretty much highlights every single element of the song in a natural way. My biggest problem is the missing notes in the saxophone solo, but other than that this is very fun.

Fleeting Ecstasy (mi40) [7.5/10, CQ/FR*]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
>chthonic/Benjamin Briggs is part of the “OverClocked ReMix” label, blanket perm link found in - “https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273003&postcount=4” and
“https://ocremix.org/community/topic/11260-artists-for-flash-flash-revolution/”

*7.096/9.000/10.905/12.810 - What are you stepping here? If it’s the melody, then why are these hi-hats stepped? Shouldn’t there be notes on 7.453/7.810/9.358/11.262/11.620/13.167?
1:06.739-1:13.048 Right now, some of the complex sax parts are simplified as 16ths. Are you sure you don’t want to step the sax accurately?

>>Prominent instrument is the focus in this understepped easy file, but it’s not consistent on some sections. Also, see the asterisk.

out of the country until mid october so hopefully i can get the new stuff uploaded by then

back home in the USA now, will get this done asap

Sounds good, will make a note in my book to give this file some leniency so it can get fixes in when you're free.

Quick ping in here to see where things are at for this file, since it's approaching OT-season for this year.

Moving to Rejected for sake of organization. If fixes are made, please re-submit them and refer in comments to this submission.