TWG CXI C9++: A Youtube Comments Page

[cedolad]

Will be awaiting for the elaboration of the gut read Manti.

Nice to be playing with you again though. How long has it been? lol

[Crazyjayde]

Mellon will have to come by and see if she has noticed anything then. I realized they were in proximity of each other, though not in the same house.
Either way I want to get my reads listed for today, need to eat and collect my thoughts.

Bynary has made some conscious effort to spread his thoughts but it visibly comes off as playing it safe. There are slight directions given to the thoughts, but it barely suffice to say he is involved in the hunt. For the record, I'm concerned about his plays and might get behind his lynch, but I'm iffy since there's nothing apart from a gut feeling that can distinguish the green and the red.

[Guest15937]

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

there's nothing apart from a gut feeling that can distinguish the green and the red.

Isn't that all there ever is? Sure, there's evidence, past experience with a player, etc. (everything else used as ammo in a TWG game) but in the end, all that stuff boils down to a gut feeling about said ammo. Barring scumslips, there won't ever be a simple post that solidly "distinguishes" the green and red.

[cedolad]

Another day 1 Bynary lynch? I'll have to look into his posts more but I can see what you mean by "conscious effort to spread his thoughts".

Again, I'll have to look into his posts.

[drizzleRomanceGirl]

i'm kind of surprised, to tell you the truth

Bynary seems the most human to me, along with iPatch and possibly cedolad

[Crazyjayde]

Originally Posted by Guest15937

Isn't that all there ever is? Sure, there's evidence, past experience with a player, etc. (everything else used as ammo in a TWG game) but in the end, all that stuff boils down to a gut feeling about said ammo. Barring scumslips, there won't ever be a simple post that solidly "distinguishes" the green and red.

In the sense of subjectivity yes. In the sense of actual evidence no, like not at all. You'd be best to analyze posts more thoroughly if you think gut feeling is all there is.

I am sharing my concerns on Bynary looking at thesunfan's stances. His observations are earnest ones, but ultimately do nothing to the town's cause. I would be wary about him, yes.

[cedolad]

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

In the sense of subjectivity yes. In the sense of actual evidence no, like not at all. You'd be best to analyze posts more thoroughly if you think gut feeling is all there is.

I'm glad you brought that up, because guess what.


INCOMING WALL OF TEXT YE

[drizzleRomanceGirl]

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

In the sense of subjectivity yes. In the sense of actual evidence no, like not at all. You'd be best to analyze posts more thoroughly if you think gut feeling is all there is.

but Guest didn't mention that gut feeling is all there is, he only said that gut feeling is what TWG games amount towards

your accusation seems a little forceful; care to explain?

[Crazyjayde]

Also, Drizz, can you elaborate on iPatch and cedolad? You are throwing additional names around as if to defend them from a distance.

[cedolad]

Post 4/5 (#35/#36):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

you're awfully talkative for the first few hours of the game.

you tell us what you're saying is junk, and then you even tell people what to do?

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

Crazyjayde

- First interaction I found. Also first real vote of the game.

Post 13 (#57):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i would vote for her too, but i'd like Crazy to explain himself first

- Tunneling on Crazy, like crazy.

Post 15 (#63):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

okay, well first of all, in your second post you immediately latch on to the idea that you're not a wolf, using reverse psychology no less. why in the world would you claim your role pretty much as soon as the game begins with a silly response? i would think a human would at least try to sound believable if he or she immediately claims his or her role.

in addition, it looks very suspicious how you change your vote so easily at the start of the game for no reason; i can understand why someone would vote without a reason on the first day, but to switch to another person without any reasons and without pressuring the primary suspect? i don't think so

also, you seem like you're purposely trying to be silly to avoid any suspicion placed on yourself because your silliness seems a little over the top

lastly, you keep saying that you're honest and you should be trusted without any viable reasons for your statements

- I found this to be a sloppily made reaction post. Feels like she is trying to force suspicion on Funnygurl using the reverse psychology meta from Funny's previous wolf games. This entire post feels forced, like she wanted to rush a wagon onto Funny.

Post 17 (#70):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

hold on, if you aren't taking my vote seriously, then why are you explaining yourself in spite of how you feel?

- Reaction to defense.

Post 18 (#71):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i would normally agree, but this is day 1, and we don't have too much to follow yet

i was going to keep my reason for funnygirl's suspicion a secret, but she specifically asked for my reasons

- If you have suspicion on someone why would you keep it a secret? Let alone post said suspicion prematurely on the merit they asked for it? I feel this to be a sloppy wolf play, and again a reaction to Funny's vote on DRG.

Post 20 (#74):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

that's not true; i can completely understand the reasons why both human and wolves would hold off on responding to an accusation

i'm planning on only basing suspicion off of what everyone posts, not what we don't post

In response to:

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

Because a rebuttal is in order. You'd be pointing your guns towards that post even if I would have left my explanation without defending my cause. It would have gone along the line of thought that I'm trying to ignore or give no value to your push on the account that it is irrational.
Basically, you might be town and may need enlightenment.

- At this point I felt like DRG switched from the aggressive offense she used on Crazy, to a more conservative defense. Also the lack of information is more the reason to base suspicion on someone. Why would you neglect that point unless you are indeed the informed majority and that lack of information doesn't hinder your decisions?

Post 23 (#79):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i'm really against the idea that someone would ask others in a game (a psychological game, no less) whether his or her posts are alright; i believe people should post how they like and according to how practical that individual thinks his or her posts are

to me, this course of action seems like it's against how an experienced player would act

i think it's beneficial for me to post nonchalantly until someone slips up in two or more posts, and then pressure that person until i feel he or she's said enough and conceed

when i pressure someone, i don't hold onto every possible evidence with little reasoning, i use the select evidence i particularly find suspicious and make strong points

- I feel this post solidifies my statement of DRG's switch from the offensive to the defensive. I feel instead of furthering her case of suspicion on Crazy she instead defends herself.

Post 24 (#80):

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i find it funny how you're so worked up that i'm pressuring you

are you trying to place all the suspicion on me by constantly pointing out how i shouldn't pressure you?

in any case, my vote stays on you, crazy

- This post makes it seem like she is trying to be nonchalant (seems to be the point behind all of her suspicion). Why though?

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

aww, but it was so silly at the start of Day 1 D:

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i'm mentally exhaused x.x

- Defeat. Tries to back off suspicion slowly. Maybe because she had zero support from others?

[cedolad]

Originally Posted by drizzleRomanceGirl

i'm kind of surprised, to tell you the truth

Bynary seems the most human to me, along with iPatch and possibly cedolad

Also this feels like a soft defense, while also trying to throw iPatch and I underneath the bus.

[cedolad]

Merry Christmas Potato-Goku, I've delivered.

Also this post may have been made hastily, I just call from work asking to come in early, so I tried to post as much as I had. I'm not going to lie, this may have been premature.

[cedolad]

Also I have a small case built on T-Force that pretty much piggybacks off of thesunfan's suspicion. But that will have to wait until later tonight/early tomorrow.

[cedolad]

I know it may be a bit early, but I'm going to have to request everyone post their reads thus far.

I have a few theories, and everyone's reads will definitely help that.

And this will be my exit post for the day, until the 'morrow fellow uninformed.

[Crazyjayde]

Ugh, well I guess I am satisfied. That's a big wall of text mainly because of citations, and to some extent it is tunneling, but most of it does kind of reinforces my thought that Drizz unfortunately doesn't know what she's doing (the seemingly aggressive turning into defense). There's no composure and I think that's what makes her totally inoffensive/green.

We're still mindmelding so I don't know what to make of you Cedo haha.

[drizzleRomanceGirl]

Originally Posted by Crazyjayde

Also, Drizz, can you elaborate on iPatch and cedolad? You are throwing additional names around as if to defend them from a distance.

i pretty much stated my reads based on hunches; i don't have too much evidence to support my reads yet

however, Bynary seems to have very thoughtful, straightforward posts from what he's said this far

iPatch seems to be a human who is disappointed in how the game is progressing, and so doesn't want to give a lot of input; it doesn't seem like a wolf would complain about the game IMO

cedolad kind of seems to have a blue role because his posts have a lot of authority and reasoning, but he also seems too careful in his posts as well

[iPatcH]

idk drizz is just an idiot and trying to escalate shit that hasn't even been going on for a full day, not sure why she decided to mention me and cedo, I guess because we both caught up and are trying to be active after waiting for hers and funny's quarrel die down because jesus christ

[mellonxcollie]

Um Tokzic, I was not drunk yesterday nor was I near your computer at all. May I remind you that you invited me out drinking yesterday, but I declined because I am going tonight? I haven't even touched your backpack since you left it here except to check what was inside it when I first discovered it. I am not a scuzzy person thank you

full disclosure to the thread: tokzic left his backpack and laptop at my house by accident

I honestly don't even know what you are trying to pull here. That post was pretty clearly you. how drunk were you...?

[iPatcH]

im not so much dissapointed as I am just annoyed, maybe I'm not familiar with all of y'alls meta shit and idk how to read anyone

[mellonxcollie]

Originally Posted by iPatcH

im not so much dissapointed as I am just annoyed, maybe I'm not familiar with all of y'alls meta shit and idk how to read anyone

Nawh TBH I don't really like the style of play this thread is currently engaged in either. but it is still Day 1 so if you manage to live to the later days, there will be a lot more in-game info to base your reads around, and people are less prone to being so silly