Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution: Community Forums > General Discussion > Critical Thinking
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-8-2007, 04:31 AM   #1
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Movies based upon historical events

We've all seen plenty of them, some have gone to great lengths to stay as true to the history as possible, others have forgone complete accuracy for the sake of action, and still others seem to have forgotten partway in that there was even a historical event that the movie was based on.

My question is this:

"Should a filmmaker be obliged to keep a movie 'based on a historical event" as accurate as possible?"

I mean...at any time you are free to make a movie about (to use a current example) an ancient battle wherein a small number of troops held off a much larger number of attackers in a glorious, epic battle for the ages, in which case you can make absolutely anything happen that you like.

However, to me, if you're going to go ahead and make it the Greeks and Persians, and make it the battle of Thermopylae, then you are -obliged- to keep your storyline as true to the actual events as you possibly can.

If you don't find the history appealing enough, don't base it on the history.
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 04:37 AM   #2
GuidoHunter
is against custom titles
FFR Veteran
 
GuidoHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 7,379
Send a message via AIM to GuidoHunter Send a message via Skype™ to GuidoHunter
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

No.

Freedom of speech and whatnot; they can do really whatever they want to do, and so long as there's a hint of a relation they can still say "based on" whatever.

Take United 93. Part of it was very strictly adhering to what happened, while the other part was pure conjecture. It was still based on the historical event.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
Sentences I thought I never would have to type.
GuidoHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 04:58 AM   #3
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

it's not a freedom of speech issue to me, you can make any movie you want about anything you want, and I'm in support of that, but if you're going to make a movie -about- X, it just seems to me that you should really make an effort to actually make your movie -be- about X
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 06:02 AM   #4
Afrobean
Admiral in the Red Army
FFR Veteran
 
Afrobean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the moon
Age: 32
Posts: 13,262
Send a message via Skype™ to Afrobean
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

The Amityville Horror was based on a true story.

So was The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

Notice: both stories were 1000% sensationalized and every aspect of the true story was changed for the films.

To be blunt, "based on" means jack crap. Obviously there are certain movies which may be entirely historical, but for every one which is entirely faithful, you get 50,000 others like Titanic or World Trade Center.

ps wasn't the film 300 actually based on a graphic novel or something? Seems like your disappointment at lack of historical accuracy should be directed at the artist of that comic.
__________________

Last edited by Afrobean; 04-8-2007 at 06:09 AM..
Afrobean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 08:55 AM   #5
bobbycat73
FFR Player
 
bobbycat73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milford, Connecticut
Posts: 339
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

whatever makes money works

im not saying all directors are like that, but if you can take an event and slightly change it to put in action and ****, and that is what will sell, then that's what you might do

directors also have the leeway to say what THEY think happened, and how they interpret it. again, freedom of speech
__________________
aids

http://mafia.cheats4us.org/index.php?x=241521 <- Hot asian chicks!!
bobbycat73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 02:30 PM   #6
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

I'm not sure why people keep mentioning freedom of speech like I was somehow trying to say that they are -forbidden- to make a movie based on historical events.

All I've been saying is "You can make a movie about that stuff ANYWAY without claiming it was a rendition of specific evenst, so why claim it's a rendition of specific events if you can't be bothered to get even -some- of it historically accurate?"
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 04:08 PM   #7
GuidoHunter
is against custom titles
FFR Veteran
 
GuidoHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 7,379
Send a message via AIM to GuidoHunter Send a message via Skype™ to GuidoHunter
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Well, you said "obliged", and my first thought was that you insinuated "required", which indeed WOULD make it a free speech issue. Now that I think about it, though it reads more like a professional obligation.

But anyway, what does "based on" mean? Hell, any movie that features a few standing against many could legitimately be "based on" the battle of Thermopylae. Surely you wouldn't require every single movie with that theme to be historically correct.

O Brother, Where Art Thou was based on a Shakespearean play (The Tempest?), but didn't claim it outright to my knowledge.

Pretty much every movie can claim to be "based on" something in the past, probably historical. There shouldn't be any obligation to make the movie historical, though.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
Sentences I thought I never would have to type.
GuidoHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 04:19 PM   #8
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

O Brother Where Art Thou was based on Homer's Odyssey, and didn't directly claim it, but was obviously intended to be seen as such. (And also was a fantastic movie) But was additionally a fictional work based on a fictional work that was probably intended as a fantastical myth version of something that probably happened.

And I see the point about how easy it is to say something is "based on" something else, but I'm not saying that every story archetype has to be expressed by a faithful reproduction of a historical event in that archetype, I just mean "If you're going to -say- it is X, then you have a professional obligation to actually be true to X"

Quote:
Surely you wouldn't require every single movie with that theme to be historically correct.
No, I'd require every single movie claiming to be about that specific battle to be historically correct. If it has a similar theme but isn't claiming to be that historical battle, it isn't under an obligation to be correct to that specific historical battle.
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 04:56 PM   #9
GuidoHunter
is against custom titles
FFR Veteran
 
GuidoHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 7,379
Send a message via AIM to GuidoHunter Send a message via Skype™ to GuidoHunter
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

My bad. I know there was some movie recently made that was based on a Shakespearean play, though... (Not Romeo and Juliet).

Quote:
Originally Posted by devonin
No, I'd require every single movie claiming to be about that specific battle to be historically correct. If it has a similar theme but isn't claiming to be that historical battle, it isn't under an obligation to be correct to that specific historical battle.
That's ridiculous, though! "Based on" NEVER has implied factual, historical accuracy, movie or no. Movies are works of fiction, not documentaries. Saying that it's "based on" some event is really just telling everyone that the creator didn't make that stuff up; he knows that it's not 100% original.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
Sentences I thought I never would have to type.
GuidoHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 05:01 PM   #10
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

It really just boils down to my dissatisfaction as a historian with the way that people slap "based on such-and-such" or in the case of something like 300, seem to blatantly say "This movie is of the battle of Thermopylae" onto all sorts of things, then don't even make the most basic attempts to make their movie historically accurate.

I mean, I'm not here to quibble about how they used sturrups on the horses in gladiator, when they didn't use stirrups there at that time, or other tiny little details like that, it's when they just seem to completely ignore the entire historical record outright because it's not "hollywood" enough.

I just think its irresponsable to directly reference historical events, and then portray them in a wildly inaccurate way. It has lead to a very wide-spread ignorance of what many world historical times and places were actually like, because the population at large only gets their education in history from things like movies and television telling them "this is how it was."
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 05:34 PM   #11
PinoySkillz
FFR Player
FFR Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 216
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Film makers should NOT be obliged to be 100% historically accurate. Movies are meant to entertain, not educate. If the director wants to add something to the movie (ie. a 7ft. monster) to increase the entertainment value at the cost of historical accuracy, then so be it.

If you want to learn about a historical event then watch a documentary on the History channel or read about it in a text book.
PinoySkillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 05:46 PM   #12
Chromer
Hookers and Blow
FFR Veteran
 
Chromer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: You heard the robot. No fun.
Age: 31
Posts: 4,981
Send a message via AIM to Chromer Send a message via Yahoo to Chromer
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoySkillz View Post
Film makers should NOT be obliged to be 100% historically accurate. Movies are meant to entertain, not educate. If the director wants to add something to the movie (ie. a 7ft. monster) to increase the entertainment value at the cost of historical accuracy, then so be it.

If you want to learn about a historical event then watch a documentary on the History channel or read about it in a text book.
Agreed. If you have ever researched the true Battle of Thermopylae (I had to in 10th grade for World History 2) there are so many things left out in "300," it would make a historian's head spin. However, that's not the point. It's all about entertaining the audience. If the director of "300" made this movie historically accurate, not only would the movie be incredibly boring, it would be a giant waste of money to make. It was aimed at red-blooded young men and that's just what they got in return: a box-office success.
__________________
Chromer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 06:25 PM   #13
GuidoHunter
is against custom titles
FFR Veteran
 
GuidoHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 7,379
Send a message via AIM to GuidoHunter Send a message via Skype™ to GuidoHunter
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Your 300 analogy fails anyway because, like Afro said, the movie 300 was based on a graphic novel. It was VERY true to that on which it was based, so you should be applauding it!

So, do you think graphic novels should now be historically accurate?

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandiagod View Post
She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
Sentences I thought I never would have to type.
GuidoHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 07:24 PM   #14
Chromer
Hookers and Blow
FFR Veteran
 
Chromer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: You heard the robot. No fun.
Age: 31
Posts: 4,981
Send a message via AIM to Chromer Send a message via Yahoo to Chromer
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

You know Guido, I bet Sin City was based on the organized crime periods of the 1920's and 1930's too. =P

/sarcasm
__________________
Chromer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 07:35 PM   #15
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoySkillz
Movies are meant to entertain, not educate.
Sure are, which is fine, and I have no problem with that. But don't tell me you're entertaining me with a movie about X, and then have your movie completely ignore the history of X. You can make a movie about a small army in ancient times holding off superior numbers, and not make it the greeks and persians and that battle of that war. Heck, use your own alternate world where there are dinosaurs if you want to add a dinosaur to the battle, go nuts, that's the joy of fiction.

I just feel that if you're going to apply the label of being based on non-fiction, you owe it to the history you intend to profit from to at least -try- to represent that history accurately. Don't want to? Then don't apply the label of basing it on non-fiction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromer
If the director of "300" made this movie historically accurate, not only would the movie be incredibly boring, it would be a giant waste of money to make.
I find it hard to believe that you could both do a proper job researching that battle -and- find that battle to be incredibly boring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoHunter
So, do you think graphic novels should now be historically accurate?
I'm a little distressed how suddenly there was a cavalcade of more hostile posting. I extend my belief to more media than just film certainly. I'm not inconsistant in my opinions about things. If in any medium you intend to state that you are representing historical events, I feel that you should therefore make an effort to portray those events properly.

There are plenty of ways to make an "Ancient World" era war movie that don't require picking an existing set of peoples, battles and conflicts to make a useful plot.
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 09:01 PM   #16
Chromer
Hookers and Blow
FFR Veteran
 
Chromer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: You heard the robot. No fun.
Age: 31
Posts: 4,981
Send a message via AIM to Chromer Send a message via Yahoo to Chromer
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Quote:
Originally Posted by devonin View Post
I find it hard to believe that you could both do a proper job researching that battle -and- find that battle to be incredibly boring.
Ok, this is where I destroy your entire argument about the movie not being boring if it was accurately portrayed.

If you knew anything about Ancient Greek fighting, it was customary for the unit to form either a phalanx or stand shoulder to shoulder holding their shields to cover the man beside them. Jutting from each shield was the main weapon of choice for the hoplite: the spear. Since the Persian army was lightly armored, when they surged forward against the Greeks, they either ran themselves on the spears or were stabbed trying to push the Greeks back. There was things called Battle Pulses, in which the Persians would try to push the Greeks for about 5 minutes than back away and do it over and over again. It wasn't a test of fighting ability, it was a test of endurance and who could withstand the most pressure from the opposing force.

Now would you rather see Persians run into spear from shields for 2 hours, or would you rather see what "300" did: make kick-ass fighting scenes in which the above tactic was rarely used?

America says "300's" way.
__________________
Chromer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 09:02 PM   #17
PinoySkillz
FFR Player
FFR Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 216
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Quote:
Originally Posted by devonin View Post
But don't tell me you're entertaining me with a movie about Frank Miller's graphic novel, and then have your movie completely ignore the history of Frank Miller's graphic novel
I may be wrong, but I don't think they ever advertised the movie as being based on the Battle of Thermopylae. They advertised it as being based on Frank Miller's graphic novel, and to that they were very accurate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by devonin
You can make a movie about a small army in ancient times holding off superior numbers, and not make it the greeks and persians and that battle of that war. Heck, use your own alternate world where there are dinosaurs if you want to add a dinosaur to the battle, go nuts, that's the joy of fiction.
Hmmm...that sounds familiar. I think it's called Lord of The Rings :P

The point is, if they made 300 the way you wanted it, it wouldn't be as entertaining. If it's not as entertaining it won't bring in as much money. Money is the bottom line.
PinoySkillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-8-2007, 10:31 PM   #18
devonin
Very Grave Indeed
FFR Simfile AuthorFFR Veteran
 
devonin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 36
Posts: 10,098
Send a message via AIM to devonin Send a message via MSN to devonin
Default Re: Movies based upon historical events

Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoySkillz
I may be wrong, but I don't think they ever advertised the movie as being based on the Battle of Thermopylae. They advertised it as being based on Frank Miller's graphic novel, and to that they were very accurate.
Er...okay...so I guess fighting in the name of being pedantic, you're right, you win, The movie 300 is suddenly completely immune to my every criticism...now...if you just replace instances of "300" with "Frank Miller's graphic novel 300" we can continue our discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PinoySkillz
The point is, if they made 300 the way you wanted it, it wouldn't be as entertaining.
Why does everyone seem to think that I'm saying you are never allowed to make any movie ever that isn't 100% based on history? I'm a -huge- fan of science fiction and fantasy, which have proven repeatedly that you can make a movie on -purely- fictional premises and make a fantastic movie.

All I've said, the entire point of my argument was this: If you -are- going to make a movie based on history, don't trample all over that history in the name of making a few more bucks.

Invent your own warring countries, your own generals and your own battle, and you can have one side bust out lasers halfway through, and I'll support that completely.

I just object to someone taking historical events and butchering them when they don't need to. Most people have -no- idea who Leonidas was, so if you've no intention of portraying Leonidas accurately, why bother naming him Leonidas? Name him something else, and do the same with the other characters, settings, and so forth and suddenly you aren't inaccurately portraying a historical event, you're just presenting your own take on a possible situation that could have occured in the time period.

Speculative historical fiction is a wonderful genre, and I read/watch/etc it extensively. My sole objection is: If you're going to use historical events and characters, use them properly and accurately. If you don't want to do that, then don't use historical events and characters.
devonin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution