SAW II

[Moogy]

Saw 1 was garbage. I see no reason to see an even more garbage sequel.

[Specforces]

Yeah, Saw 2 was garbage though.

[NaOTa4231]

Ugh... Most of you have no taste in movies. THIS IS NOT A GOOD MOVIE. The end had little to do with the story. I saw it coming. It didn't make the movie worth it. Again, if you think a movie is good because of gore, then that's the only way to see this as a good movie. How can any of you say it's awesome? Awesome is Pulp Fiction. Fuck. Oh wait, you're all 13 and think Harry Potter movies are well made movies. Nevermind

and all the movies you like are perfect, right?

[vashthestampede0987]

Originally Posted by NaOTa4231

Ugh... Most of you have no taste in movies. THIS IS NOT A GOOD MOVIE. The end had little to do with the story. I saw it coming. It didn't make the movie worth it. Again, if you think a movie is good because of gore, then that's the only way to see this as a good movie. How can any of you say it's awesome? Awesome is Pulp Fiction. Fuck. Oh wait, you're all 13 and think Harry Potter movies are well made movies. Nevermind

and all the movies you like are perfect, right?

It would of made a lot more sense if you put quote tags as to where bandit wrote. And yes, all movies are perfect like banditcom and the girls in his avatar.

[Mental_detachment]

Originally Posted by GuidoHunter

Would I need to see the first one? I heard it was incredibly terrible.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

yes you do need to see the first one!! dont listen to whoever said you didnt
otherwise the AWESOME twist at the end of the first one will be ruined

and its an extremely good well thought out movie
its not horror its psyco-thriller and it is every meaning of the term "instant classic"

[vashthestampede0987]

Originally Posted by Mental_detachment

yes you do need to see the first one!! dont listen to whoever said you didnt
otherwise the AWESOME twist at the end of the first one will be ruined

and its an extremely good well thought out movie
its not horror its psyco-thriller and it is every meaning of the term "instant classic"

I realized that you're entitled to your own opinion, but you're probably the type that thought XXX (Vin Diesel, not porno you fags) was a good movie.

[jewpinthethird]

Well, let me put it this way:

If this were a made for TV movie, I'd be the best made for tv movie ever. Which is what it the pacing felt like. I believe the idea behind the story is rather clever and the movie kept me entertained. The detective really pissed me off...which I guess is for the better.

But I still hated the directing/editting for the most part. Seriously. I wanted to see a movie, not have a f*cking seizure. It's not a cool effect and it doesnt make the movie more edgy. I understand that totally flipping the sh*t with the cinematography makes gruesome scenes more bareable...but come on.

Oh yeah, big-stupid-guy who goes on a rampage to escape captivity was done to death in The Cube.

[dizoneaznboiii]

i thought that saw 1 was decent and i thought that saw 2 was incredible. watching the first saw does help explain some things in the second movie but its not necessary, and in my opinion, i find that that the writer or saw to be a sick and twisted genious.

[Schrammbledeggs]

The ending of 2 would have been better if it was the son who was the killer. And what is all this crap I'm reading about people dissing movies calling them garbage and stuff? Movies are as good as the person watching them makes it out to be. Sure it might be garbage to you but that just means you have high standards. Nothing wrong with that just don't expect other people to have the same standards as you.