|
|
#1 |
|
Fractals!
|
I think I understand how to direct-link, but in the meantime, time for a thumbnail of a score that just totally blew me away. I don't think I'll be able to touch this one for a while, nor my Euromorroc Standard. I got 2 greats and a miss on it once and have broken 400 marvs, though, but it wasn't as high-scoring as the one I already have on the table, so I didn't SS that. Anyway, here's the shot of my newest highscore.
Shut up, Ridder, 600 bpm streams are quite difficult for me to PA, and the patterns on Heavy are so weird I've only gotten an FC twice, one with TDG (Triple Digit Greats XD). Fortunately, though, the 16ths were in little bursts, but the ending is still annoying. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
lol.. 600 bpm streams? unless it's all 4th notes..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
FFR Player
|
There are no 600BPM streams in Katz and no 700+ BPM streams in Euromorroc
EDIT: Because the streams in those sims are 16th notes. It'd be IMPOSSIBLE to pass if the BPM was that high.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
lol.. it's 150 bpm 16ths.. he was playing it on 4x thinking it made it 600 bpm.
igotrythym- it's 600bpm scroll, not song bpm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 365
|
cool you're the only person who has played R2 after the first day it was released congratulations
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
God
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fractals!
|
It's not song bpm, I just took 150 bpm 16ths and translated it to 4 times the speed of 4th notes: 150x4=600. But in the future, I think I'll refer to this as SPM, "steps per minute." Sorry for the misunderstanding.
In the meantime, anyone impressed at how I only got 2 greats? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
FFR Player
|
Just refer to it as CXXX or something so everyone will know what you're talking about.
And that's not the heavy steps, is it? If it isn't, 2 greats isn't that impressive.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fractals!
|
I'm just going to ignore that and post what I think is a good CB count on Synesthetic. I'm still surprised I broke 100 million but still failed to AA. XD
![]() And yes, I am aware that the accuracy is a total piece of shit. That's only because the patterns are as weird as hell. By the way, "synesthetic" is a real word. Look it up, you'll be one word smarter. At least, that's what my mom says. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
FFR Player
|
Okay, you know what? Fix the PA. You have waaaay too many greats. Try lowering the quality and see what happens. The MA is acceptable but the PA is what's gaying up your scores XD
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fractals!
|
You wanted to see Katz on Heavy? Here you go.
![]() I jumped the gun a little bit with the Print Screen button...it's obviously an AA. Hmm...lower quality? What I'm trying to do is increase the speed in order to make the accuracy windows bigger, since marvelous and perfect are time-based and not position-based. Thanks for the tip, anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
FFR Player
|
After I got 4/5 perf on katz and played a few other songs after and slaughtered the scores and ended up getting 5th/6th and learned that 1st place had like 20x as many perfects and the scoring was random and it's laggy etc etc etc I decided not to play :P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
FFR Player
|
Yeah, the scoring system makes no sense whatsoever.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Fractals!
|
![]() Finally, I've AAed this thing. Jumps in 16th streams give me fits (especially when they're on the 16th notes), and that little freeze near the 64th notes is a constant annoyance when I blow it partway through. Next stop, I guess, is getting better than C on Reality. In general, streams faster than C650 give me trouble unless I can see a pattern to them, in which case I can get to about C700. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Fractals!
|
And now for a bizarre thing that happened during MP play. Yeah, I know it's an easy song, but still, I think we can all agree that it's nice to be on top.
![]() Edit: This was from a hell of a long time ago, so I had to do some digging. Hence why it's in the picture editor. The reason I had to do this was because I originally saved it as a bitmap...I know, stupid. So I plopped the shot into the image editor, shot that, then saved it as a PNG, producing the result you can see here. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|