The Trump Administration Is Trying to Get Rid of People Who Are Transgender :(

[PixlSM]

Originally Posted by xXOpkillerXx

Though from a very preventive pov couldn't someone say that it is more suspect to see a man go in women's bathroom than in genderless bathroom ? Idk I don't think so but maybe there's a point to be made there..

pretty sure the whole idea is that some creeper could enter a womens bathroom (and if questioned claim they are trans) and do typical perv-in-the-womens-bathroom-stuff.
its kind of a silly argument because theres nothing stopping a man going in there anyways outside of nearby people giving them a look, since once they go in and start doing their thing they are bound to get kicked out regardless of any transgender rule. also I doubt bathrooms are really going to be a hotspot for sexual assault anyways, we already have undergrad parties and quiet alleys for that


also fuck you cause now I got tricked into participating in this thread

[xXOpkillerXx]

Originally Posted by PixlSM

pretty sure the whole idea is that some creeper could enter a womens bathroom (and if questioned claim they are trans) and do typical perv-in-the-womens-bathroom-stuff.
its kind of a silly argument because theres nothing stopping a man going in there anyways outside of nearby people giving them a look, since once they go in and start doing their thing they are bound to get kicked out regardless of any transgender rule. also I doubt bathrooms are really going to be a hotspot for sexual assault anyways, we already have undergrad parties and quiet alleys for that


also fuck you cause now I got tricked into participating in this thread

Yeah it's just too hard to actually give a purpose to gendered bathrooms with real control; claiming trans is undebatable...

[drizzleRomanceGirl]

Originally Posted by xXOpkillerXx

3. That's just illogical. If person A is allowed to state their opinion without it being criticized, you're basically saying that some person B cannot state theirs if it criticizes A's opinion... You're saying that people should have the right to obligate others to not argue one's beliefs and that's just very bad in terms of society behavior. Like here Archowl's thread on victimhood would actually be a good read for you and I'm not saying that in a derogatory way; the vid he has posted in his OP is quite interesting on that topic.

Originally Posted by G.S.M

That's not how things work. I'm sorry, but it really does not. Unless you are in a echo chamber of people that agree with every uninformed feelings only opinion. If you cannot handle someone criticizing your opinion then just stay away from arguments/debates/whatever and post it on your facebook of friends. Most illogical thing I have read since a queenashy thread.

sorry i didn't mean that no one should be allowed to criticize or disagree with someone's opinion, i just meant that everyone's opinion is just as legitimate as each others' and someone should be able to state that person's own opinion without it being criticized as a bad opinion

IMO no one's opinion is bad because it's how they feel and everyone's feelings are legitimate IMO

[rayword45]

Originally Posted by SputnikOwns

I for one am totally in favour of it.

[Aquellex]

It's not surprising that the notion of L-platers driving the speed limit on highways is stepping on everyone's toes since that's what left-wing government does; it steps on peoples' toes with radical leftist ideology such as the idea that your child shouldn't be involved in a car accident. I mean I'm not saying that it is or isn't okay for your child to be involved in a car accident, in fact it doesn't matter what I think on the issue. That should be entirely up to the parents, not the state.

It's the exact same with left-wing ideologies, who have this Marxist notion of speed limit that say on Twitter that I talk too fast. And my question to them in both circumstances is exactly the same: what is the left's issue with speed? If I want people to only understand about 70% of what I'm saying, that is my right under the 1st amendment and it supersedes your feelings that 'slow and steady wins the race'.

Now isn't it interesting that the phrase that espouses the virtues of slowness has the word 'race' in it, and that is the side that the left feels most natural defending. No, it's not interesting at all. In fact, nothing is more mundane and predictable because to the left, everything is about race and never about individual choices.

[Aquellex]

[xXOpkillerXx]

Lol'd at "22 million times"

[Aquellex]

I don't agree with people saying "trannies should be denied basic human rights and need to be treated like the victims of the holocaust", but I will defend to death their right to say it without fear of persecution

/s

[Aquellex]

I want the right to advocate for Blaire's white genocide

[Trenchery]

Don't worry im already planning to move to Sweden as soon as possible so i dont gotta deal with this shitstorm of american government and i can actually be like yknow, not something im not lmao

[V-Ormix]

swedens getting over run by a migrant crisis the size of a shoe

LOOOOOL