TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Microsoft]

basically what i gather from your list is that you feel safe about the people you know barring a couple exceptions, and want to test those you don't/haven't tested in a while

google, shell, mcds, me, and maybe ge.
from that list i'm pretty sure i know who mcds is (same as you), and i have an idea who ge is based upon something said earlier. other than that, google and mcds elude me

[Wells Fargo]

do you know who mcds is or not? not clear from your response

[Microsoft]

also i'm guessing you don't believe that the acq was alibaba and then replaced out? slightly angleshooty but w/e

[Microsoft]

i have no fucking clue who mcds is

[Microsoft]

i have:
confidence in who these people are: wells, shell, starbucks, ibm and facebook.
a guess on: ge
no damn clue: google, mcds, alibaba (obv), marlboro

[Microsoft]

i originally had google between some players but upon re-reading, have basically figured it couldn't be either

[Wells Fargo]

can I get your town and wolf leans while you're here?

you knowing those players makes me more confident I know who you are.

[Microsoft]

Originally Posted by Disney

this is a bad idea
acquisitioner is just like the SK in any other game: they have an incentive to kill wolves early to increase their chances of survival to the end of the game
as an added bonus however, they gain perfect information on the entire wolf team as soon as they kill one
we will want to hunt for the acquisitioner specifically once either a wolf gets nightkilled (though that's just as likely to be a vigi kill) or in another phase or two
wolves are far more important because we do not want to have a mylo/lylo situation with 7-9 people

Originally Posted by Xiz

:

upon re-reading google's posts i noticed this disney one and thought of something.
is there a chance the acq has accessed the wolf team and doesn't want to move until later on when there's less parity?

ex: we're currently at 9 v 2 with an acq hiding in there somewhere. would is be smart for them to wait until it's like <5 v 2?
a mislynch goes to 8 v 2, wolfkill + vigi kill (assuming they keep ge alive) goes to 6 v 2, mislynch goes to 5 v 2.
acq jumps ship following wolf kill to go 4 v 1 (maybe even 3 v 1 vigi depending)
acq leads lynch on last wolf: 3/4 v 0 and kill one last town. it's either 1 v 1 (win) or 2 v 1 in f3

what if there was no acquisition

what if the acq was on the verizon train because they knew they were a wolf and dead weight, so they gain town points for the lynch and also help their own victory by killing off another wolf

[Microsoft]

can you also give me a few minutes to re-read a couple people? i have a few nulls i'd like to solidify my opinion on more

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Microsoft

can you also give me a few minutes to re-read a couple people? i have a few nulls i'd like to solidify my opinion on more

no rush

[Wells Fargo]

re: your bigger post, I mean its all still possible, it still makes no goddamn sense for China Mobile to be a wolfkill, even if the acq is in wolfchat.

I mean, what are we going to do about that if that's happening? We can test the people who voted on the wagon and go from there, I guess, but other than that, we can't really do anything about that, at least not anything worthwhile imo.

[Microsoft]

Originally Posted by Facebook

I am amused by your silly attempts to try and scum read me. Unfortunately, i don't see the use in trying to attack someone for having 2 posts on day 0. It's inactivity. It's simple as that. I laugh at the thought that this is a wolf who is just so scared that she cant post? I'm just busy checking up on all of my friends statuses.

Originally Posted by Facebook

Look, if it would please you guys i can start playing like a wolf. It's not the role i recieved, but i can pretend.

Originally Posted by Facebook

I would also like to call to people's attention the fact that anybody who is reading me as [color="Green"]a top wolf at this moment is complete shit at the game.

d0

Originally Posted by Facebook

After reading through the thread im getting the feeling that china mobil, and amazon are wolves. Hot tastey gut read says something is off about ge.

d1

Originally Posted by Facebook

well at least we have alibaba back. i think his entrance tells us he's not the acquisitioner. could still be woofing though.

d2. this is what gave them away to me as to who they were.
the transition in language between d0 to d2 is drastic (phone posting aside), and i don't think d2-facebook would go so far as to drop the green part if they play without the anons

facebook

[Microsoft]

this does blow my earlier tinfoil theory out of the water if true, but w/e

[Microsoft]

and now back to re-reading

[Microsoft]

i'm a little more confident in who google may be and i also think they're slightly trying to hide it initially.
normally their activity could be seen as towny af and upon reading, i am starting to believe it

[Microsoft]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

can I get your town and wolf leans while you're here?

you knowing those players makes me more confident I know who you are.

town:
wells
ibm
ge
starbucks
shell
google

null:
marlboro
alibaba

null-wolf:
mcds

wolf/acq:
facebook

[Microsoft]

i'd love to see more activity today from marlboro and alibaba (wouldn't we all)?
i haven't liked mcds for practically the entire game and i already covered part of why facebook

[Facebook]

Originally Posted by Microsoft

also i'm guessing you don't believe that the acq was alibaba and then replaced out? slightly angleshooty but w/e

this is why i dont think he's the acquisitioner

[Facebook]

Originally Posted by Microsoft

d0


d1



d2. this is what gave them away to me as to who they were.
the transition in language between d0 to d2 is drastic (phone posting aside), and i don't think d2-facebook would go so far as to drop the green part if they play without the anons

facebook

i dont understand how you came to this conclusion about the green part.

[Microsoft]

because of who you are. that is something i don't think you ever say. you usually don't have enough balls to fire that off

nor the proper punctuation