TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Wells Fargo]

By the way, in that live game, the masons outed during the second day phase, long before she checked them.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by IBM

Disney
Amazon

That's actually incredible.

[IBM]

Originally Posted by GE

honestly, we don't want to lose the doctor. The role blocker is important and if they ping the right person, no wolf kill. The pile they have to choose from just got A LOT smaller.

Pretty much this.

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

That's actually incredible.

Sarcastic or no?

[Marlboro]

I've just be frustrated lately with irl shit. Doesn't help that I subbed into a game where one of the roles is literally a 3rd party who subs people, making my subbing in scummy from the start. I have no clue how to proceed without screwing up and I'm starting to think that there isn't a way to do so.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by IBM

Sarcastic or no?

You've targeted the vigi shot each night.
It doesn't really mean anything, its just funny to look at.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

I've just be frustrated lately with irl shit. Doesn't help that I subbed into a game where one of the roles is literally a 3rd party who subs people, making my subbing in scummy from the start. I have no clue how to proceed without screwing up and I'm starting to think that there isn't a way to do so.

Gotcha. Subbing into a spot like that is pretty awful.

I think you've won me a free lunch or dinner if that makes you feel any better.

[Wells Fargo]

Shell- Cop (Facebook Green N1, Microsoft Green N2)
GE- Vigilante (Disney N1, Amazon N2)
IBM- Blocker (Disney N1, Amazon N2)
Starbucks- Deal Breaker (x N1, Marlboro N2)

VT/Doc group:
Wells Fargo
McDonalds
Google

Not claimed:
Marlboro
Alibaba
Facebook
Microsoft

is where we're at

can we get a claim just for the sake of having everything, Marlboro?

Remember, "doctor or vt"

[Marlboro]

Okay, I'll claim doctor or vt.

[Starbucks]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

I've just be frustrated lately with irl shit. Doesn't help that I subbed into a game where one of the roles is literally a 3rd party who subs people, making my subbing in scummy from the start. I have no clue how to proceed without screwing up and I'm starting to think that there isn't a way to do so.

god fucking damnit

[Starbucks]

anonymous replacements totally fuck over any attempt at reading the acquisitioner

[Starbucks]

my first block was on GE btw, I don't remember why tho

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Starbucks

my first block was on GE btw, I don't remember why tho

OH MY GODDDDDDDDDDDD THANK THE FUCKING LORD

our vigi isn't acquisitioned I was actually petrified that might be the case

[Starbucks]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

OH MY GODDDDDDDDDDDD THANK THE FUCKING LORD

our vigi isn't acquisitioned I was actually petrified that might be the case

that's not how this works

my power only works if it targets the ACQUISITIONER, not his target

so the only way my power could have worked D0 is if it hit Walmart.

[Starbucks]

it's like a roleblocker that works exactly for the acquisitioner

which is why I was originally confident in my Marlboro read

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Starbucks

that's not how this works

my power only works if it targets the ACQUISITIONER, not his target

so the only way my power could have worked D0 is if it hit Walmart.

Read your role again.

✧

[Wells Fargo]

Acquisitioner cannot use the powers of a power role if they take over a power role

so GE was not acquisitoned.

thankfully.

[GE]

Originally Posted by Shell

Read your role again.

✧

He's right you know.

[Wells Fargo]

We know that:
IBM is not acquisitoned (replacement stuff, or at least its very likely they were not acquired)
Marlboro is not acquisitioned (replacement stuff, or at least its very likely they were not acquired)
GE is not acquisitioned because of the night death confirmation
Starbucks was not acquisitioned (no way someone puts in that much work into language analysis. I'll ISO him again to make sure stuff is consistent tho)
Shell was not acquisitioned (That player is REALLY HARD to impersonate, and the question I asked him is pretty lock, and I thought they were that player on d0)

We can guess that:
Google was not acquisitioned (Kinda trusting Shell here, I'll ISO them though)
McDonalds was not acquisitioned (I will ISO this player again but I made a snap read on their identity that I am almost positive is right and they've felt consistent)
I was not acquisitioned (Shell/Google/Starbucks can vouch for me on this one, I think)

Leaving:
Facebook (But I don't think so, I'll ISO)
Alibaba
Microsoft

can I get input on this?

Also Starbucks is correct about how his role works, as I understand it.

[Wells Fargo]

Starbucks, other than IBM, who else stood out when you did language analysis?