TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[GE]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Ok, its absolutely a horrible shot if you shoot me.

But its even worse to shoot Starbucks. Starbucks has claimed a role, and is not counterclaimed. You are not allowed to shoot him unless someone counterclaims him.

I do what I want!

[Wells Fargo]

I cannot tell if you are seriously considering shooting me or not.
If you are, lolyou.

[GE]

You guys have no idea how hard this game has been for me. You could be my next shot, who knows.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by GE

You guys have no idea how hard this game has been for me. You could be my next shot, who knows.

Vigi is a hard role to play, so I get that its hard, but just don't go nuts.

I was on both wagons that killed wolves when there were viable counterwagons on villagers. If you're still going coo-koo a bit before EOD, let me know, and we can try to talk it out.

[Wells Fargo]

Welcome back Marlboro, btw.

[Marlboro]

I go asleep and you fuckers start claiming roles. God doesn't exist.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

I go asleep and you fuckers start claiming roles. God doesn't exist.

I agree with your conclusion, not sure how it draws upon the premise, however.

[GE]

Yeah, it's hard being vigi, but in this game im also trying to choose the account the acquisitioner is going to choose, which sucks. I've failed so far. So if we don't lynch acquisitioner today, you are on the table. Why do you guys think I've been so adamant about killing him.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by GE

Yeah, it's hard being vigi, but in this game im also trying to choose the account the acquisitioner is going to choose, which sucks. I've failed so far. So if we don't lynch acquisitioner today, you are on the table. Why do you guys think I've been so adamant about killing him.

Wat

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by GE

Yeah, it's hard being vigi, but in this game im also trying to choose the account the acquisitioner is going to choose, which sucks. I've failed so far. So if we don't lynch acquisitioner today, you are on the table. Why do you guys think I've been so adamant about killing him.

Ex 5: If both the Acquisitioner and the Vigilante target the same player, the acquisition will fail.

-From the OP.

[GE]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Ex 5: If both the Acquisitioner and the Vigilante target the same player, the acquisition will fail.

-From the OP.

Yeah, because I kill them instead of then taking over. I catch them in their tracks essentially.

[GE]

Or ou'd I kill the person the acquisitioner is and the deal breaker stops them, I can kill them that way.

[GE]

Or if *

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by GE

Yeah, because I kill them instead of then taking over. I catch them in their tracks essentially.

If you're sure that that's how that works, then that's neat, and not how I thought it worked.

But I think you should leave blocking the acquisitioner to the deal breaker maybe????

[Wells Fargo]

Look, I think you're overthinking this.

Just try and shoot wolves dude.

If there aren't any left, we can get to these hero shots, but there are still wolves left, and we have to deal with those before the acquisitioner.

[Marlboro]

lol, like he's gonna listen to anything.

[GE]

Maybe, but I'm more worried with them than the wplves. The wolves are stuck where they are.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

lol, like he's gonna listen to anything.

out of line, dude.

[Wells Fargo]

Marlboro, wanna talk about why claiming roles is the end-times proclamation to you, or you gonna make potshots to someone talking about how stressful playing his role has been?

[IBM]

Originally Posted by GE

Game plan:
Lynch Marlboro
If acquisitioner, I'll kill wells
If not, I'm killing wells.

Easy.

Medic protect either me or shell DON'T SAY IT IN THREAD

Originally Posted by GE

I do what I want!

Wells might be a deep wolf but now is not the time to shoot them, and the AQ going after them if Marlboro is a miss is just plain stupid.