TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[GE]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

His reaction when I voted them, he was POSITIVE they were town and he was giving me "I'm the seer" feels.

I mean, for the 6915th time, I was right for the wrong reason, but I really should've just been wrong is my point.

I wouldn't have checked them either, but Shell might've. There wasn't anyone clamoring for a vigi to shoot the counter to whoever died, and some vigis come away from that thinking Toyota was town.

I think Toyota is a great check in this circumstance, and I thought Shell did it.

Ok, that makes sense.

[Google]

Originally Posted by GE

What I really want to know is why Starbucks or wells didn't die. They are leading the thread the most

This is throwing me off too, I was expecting one of them/shell/me to die because of activity or amount we're showing up as town in reads lists. I guess maybe scum believes PR's would never be active and their China Mobile kill was an attempt at pr hunting.

you know what? As I'm typing this, it kinda makes sense. iirc, china mobile was posting a bit more emotionally and aggressively once people were starting to get on them after the inactivity. The scum would know china wasn't on their team and pr would try not to have a lot of people on them

Originally Posted by GE

Everyone has been "i know all these people" but not one person said they know me. I kinda like it.

I don't give a shit who you are, all I know is you flipping out on Shell was stupid

[Wells Fargo]

I agree with that being why China Mobile died, Google.

I mean I guess its for postgame, but its still just a really bad kill, at least in my opinion. Maybe I can be convinced otherwise.

[GE]

I do what I want

[Wells Fargo]

Google, can we get a claim?

[Shell]

tf when you wanted to check China but then decided not to.

✧

[Shell]

Feels Good Man

✧

[GE]

It took you this long to say that because???
The last post of the last day phase, besides mine, was telling the vigi to kill them. Why would you think of checking them?

[Google]

Originally Posted by Shell

Facebook n1

Microsoft n2

Thinking about which of these would be more likely to be godfather if one of them is the role.
Both starting off inactive but Microsoft having sudden influx of activity day 1 (which I'm assuming is why he got targeted?)

Although microsoft did get active (though it took a while), I still can't get over the latching with people calling shell the acquisitioner

[Shell]

Originally Posted by GE

It took you this long to say that because???
The last post of the last day phase, besides mine, was telling the vigi to kill them. Why would you think of checking them?

In the event the vigi decided not to since previouis EoD the vigi did not tackle any of the other lynch targets.

But then assumed it was too much to gamble, so went Microsoft instead.

Actually had it on McDonalds for a bit before switching to Microsoft too, but decided to just put it on a player that wanted McDonalds dead instead.

✧

[Google]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Google, can we get a claim?

Doctor or VT

[Google]

Originally Posted by Shell

previouis

seceond

[Shell]

I tried not to do an inactive player seer though, since usually at this stage of the game, inactives are probably just super bored town or something.

THOUGH WHAT DO I KNOW, TWO OF THE WOLVES WERE PRETTY INACTIVE SO ????????

✧

[Wells Fargo]

Did Starbucks say who they targeted N1?

[Google]

I don't believe they did

[GE]

you don't know how to ISO? We all have the same info in thread.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by GE

you don't know how to ISO? We all have the same info in thread.

Maybe I'm on mobile and can't ISO?
Or maybe I'm just lazy.
Pick one.

[GE]

Both.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

This is a really terrible post by the way.
It sounds like Marlboro is giving credit to the possibility that he COULD have been acquisitioned, Idk how to describe it other than that.

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Marlboro

I know I might be overthinking it a bit, but the replacements can come off as differently as another player would if acquired.

Marlboro wasn't replaced btw, or at least that's what I'm thinking after they posted this.