TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] - Page 71

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shell

Pff, the last EoD was just a shot in the dark and you know it, lmao.

✧

Early votes on Verizon weren't because inactive, I don't remember any of Verizon's posts actually being good enough to stand out, along with his shitty vote and ditch on wells. Don't even

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:07 AM

Okay, finally back, sorry.

✧

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:11 AM

Haven't read all the posts from start up until now, but I'm seeing a lot of 'suprised Amazon was town' posts and it's throwing up red flags. All these posts and no votes on Amazon for final vote count

Marlboro · 06-9-2017, 01:11 AM

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

Starbucks · 06-9-2017, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marlboro

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

Are you doubting my claim and night action?

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starbucks

I am about to make a shitty play, but I want vindication from Wells Fargo so I'm just gonna do it anyway

despite the potential that all of the evidence I have is wrong, I'm just gonna make this easy

I'm the deal breaker and I targeted Marlboro last night

The monster post I made was my reasoning for choosing Marlboro last night, but I want to make clear that the MAIN REASON I think Marlboro is a acq. is because I targeted him and no acq. kill happened.

I'm more or less useless as a PR at this point, except in the case I'm wrong, in which case oh well

sik

The only thing that would suck if our beloved blocker blocked you.

✧

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google

Haven't read all the posts from start up until now, but I'm seeing a lot of 'suprised Amazon was town' posts and it's throwing up red flags. All these posts and no votes on Amazon for final vote count

Namely IBM

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:15 AM

But I don't think that's the case, because well, Acquistioned failed, lmao

✧

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marlboro

You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb.

Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

A likely story.

✧

Marlboro · 06-9-2017, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starbucks

Are you doubting my claim and night action?

Nope, if anything targeting me was a good play. I'm just saying I'm not the Aquisitioner. Of course if I start acting weirdly next day phase you know why.

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

IBM- I think Freezin was townie because of meta. This is probably the worst read I've made thus far, and I really should have a better read on IBM. The person that replaced WV feels more similar to their wolf meta, so keep an eye on them.

Wells, haven't played with WV. what's their wolf meta?

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shell

sik

The only thing that would suck if our beloved blocker blocked you.

✧

...Actually, I just read the OP, not sic.

I don't think Deal Breaker outright stops the actual person.

...

Welp

✧

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:23 AM

Like, it stops someone from being acquired, not stopping the acquisitioner outright.

✧

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:23 AM

Oh dear...

✧

Shell · 06-9-2017, 01:23 AM

Still, the funky timing from Malboro.

✧

Starbucks · 06-9-2017, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shell

Like, it stops someone from being acquired, not stopping the acquisitioner outright.

✧

It stops the acquisitioner before they "move"

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shell

Like, it stops someone from being acquired, not stopping the acquisitioner outright.

✧

What's the difference to you?

Starbucks · 06-9-2017, 01:28 AM

I'm certain of this

Marlboro · 06-9-2017, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starbucks

It stops the acquisitioner before they "move"

Well then perhaps the acquisitioner targeted China Mobile or Amazon?

Google · 06-9-2017, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google

What's the difference to you?

nvmd

06-9-2017, 01:07 AM	#1402
Shell FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] Okay, finally back, sorry. ✧

06-9-2017, 01:11 AM	#1403
Google FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] Haven't read all the posts from start up until now, but I'm seeing a lot of 'suprised Amazon was town' posts and it's throwing up red flags. All these posts and no votes on Amazon for final vote count

06-9-2017, 01:11 AM	#1404
Marlboro FFR Player Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] You guys should think a little harder. Like why would the Acquisitioner lob uncertain votes around if they were active on D0? Wouldn't they want to not get in trouble and drive suspicion away from themselves? Cause, you know, that'd be dumb. Now Starbucks, if you dealbreaked me, it could mean that the Acquistioner is after me due to my lackluster posting history, and felt the need to use my account to hide.

06-9-2017, 01:15 AM	#1408
Shell FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] But I don't think that's the case, because well, Acquistioned failed, lmao ✧

06-9-2017, 01:23 AM	#1413
Shell FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] Like, it stops someone from being acquired, not stopping the acquisitioner outright. ✧

06-9-2017, 01:23 AM	#1414
Shell FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] Oh dear... ✧

06-9-2017, 01:23 AM	#1415
Shell FFR Player Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] Still, the funky timing from Malboro. ✧

06-9-2017, 01:28 AM	#1418
Starbucks FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 5	Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread] I'm certain of this

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)