|
|
#1381 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1382 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
Its not even really a discussion, I guess.
Its more of a "We won't know until postgame." Someone mentioned they could be our vigi, I guess only the player that's in the slot of our vigi knows for sure, but that's potentially a reason why they would not move, but the China Mobile vigi shot (which is what I'm rolling with) feels town-oriented. |
|
|
|
|
#1383 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1384 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
By the way, if Starbucks is acquisitioned, I will literally buy a plane ticket, fly to the acquisitioner's house and suck their cock. If they're a girl then I guess we'll figure something out.
|
|
|
|
|
#1385 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1386 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
I am up way past my bedtime.
I think massclaiming minus the doctor and deal breaker is good. Doctor can get at least one save on the vigi and honestly wolves probably just have to bank on vigi making bad shots to have a chance this game. I think waiting a day is kind of pointless, 11 left in what was originally a 20 player game is a pretty great time to claim considering NONE of our PRs are dead and 2/3 roles that interfere with our PRs from the wolf-side are dead and the Godfather basically is a glorified Vanilla Wolf. Seer is basically worthless, Roleblocker is basically worthless since they can't stop acquisitions and the massclaim actually helps their chances of blocking a wolfkill mathematically at this time. |
|
|
|
|
#1387 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
Oh, ok. I think that's even more ridiculous that a deal breaker would target MARLBORO THE FOUR POSTER, but ok, I really like the taste of fried chicken, even if it is spicy.
|
|
|
|
|
#1388 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
am I getting my point across to anybody
|
|
|
|
|
#1389 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1390 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1391 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1392 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
nevermind, I've done my civic duty here
|
|
|
|
|
#1393 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1394 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
wells fargo, if the deal breaker targeted Marlboro, should they claim here
|
|
|
|
|
#1395 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1396 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
I mean if they believe in your case, sure.
|
|
|
|
|
#1397 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
|
Last post of the night is if the massclaim does happen, people SHOULD NOT claim VT, they should claim
"VT, Doctor or Dealbreaker" aorn. |
|
|
|
|
#1398 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
I am about to make a shitty play, but I want vindication from Wells Fargo so I'm just gonna do it anyway
despite the potential that all of the evidence I have is wrong, I'm just gonna make this easy I'm the deal breaker and I targeted Marlboro last night The monster post I made was my reasoning for choosing Marlboro last night, but I want to make clear that the MAIN REASON I think Marlboro is a acq. is because I targeted him and no acq. kill happened. I'm more or less useless as a PR at this point, except in the case I'm wrong, in which case oh well |
|
|
|
|
#1399 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
I suck for claiming, etc, I don't give a shit, sorry
|
|
|
|
|
#1400 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
if an acquisition kill happened last night, I was not going to make that monster post fwiw
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|
|