Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution > Gaming > The Werewolf Game > TWG Archives
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-9-2017, 12:05 AM   #1341
IBM
FFR Player
 
IBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shell View Post
I still wanna say Facebook is an airhead.

Maybe Walmart? idk

eh?
IBM is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:05 AM   #1342
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shell View Post
I still wanna say Facebook is an airhead.

Maybe Walmart? idk

What is happening right now

When did I go through a time-machine?
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:06 AM   #1343
Shell
FFR Player
 
Shell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
maaaaaaaaaaaaaaan, that nightkill makes me think there's a CHANCE that Shell is a wolf
Would I make kills that made no sense?

Shell is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:06 AM   #1344
IBM
FFR Player
 
IBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
What is happening right now

When did I go through a time-machine?
This might be the first game where you and I as players are on the same mindset?

What the fuck
IBM is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:06 AM   #1345
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM View Post
I think what he's asking is why you're confident they failed versus why they didn't opt to not use their power, which is an option.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

well I don't know that.

I do assume that they were going to fire every night, but yeah, if they're in a comfy spot, they don't have to and more than arguably shouldn't
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:06 AM   #1346
Shell
FFR Player
 
Shell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
What is happening right now

When did I go through a time-machine?
What? What's wrong?

Shell is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:07 AM   #1347
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shell View Post
Would I make kills that made no sense?

FUCK YEAH YOU WOULD

literally 50% of how I read you every game is looking at the night 1 kill as "does this kill look like it was made by a TWG playing chimpanzee or not"

its just night 2 this time instead
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:07 AM   #1348
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shell View Post
What? What's wrong?

I have a problem with you saying WalMart is your fourth town, that's all.
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:08 AM   #1349
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM View Post
This might be the first game where you and I as players are on the same mindset?

What the fuck
Not really a big thing.
Any sane person should be having this reaction.
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:08 AM   #1350
IBM
FFR Player
 
IBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

well I don't know that.

I do assume that they were going to fire every night, but yeah, if they're in a comfy spot, they don't have to and more than arguably shouldn't
Let me ask you this for the shit of it:

What are the odds the AQ is in the wolf pile?
IBM is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:10 AM   #1351
GE
FFR Player
 
GE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM View Post
Let me ask you this for the shit of it:

What are the odds the AQ is in the wolf pile?
you're not asking me, but I highly doubt it.
GE is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:11 AM   #1352
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM View Post
Let me ask you this for the shit of it:

What are the odds the AQ is in the wolf pile?
This is a tough question, but I think if they are in the wolf pile, they're trying to get out of it, so I think they would use their power, right?

But I don't really know the odds. We shouldn't be so lucky as to be looking for a SK-Wolf combo, especially with how this game has played out, so I'm inclined to say its not happening, but there is literally 0 logical reasoning there.

Starbucks, your 10 minutes is up.
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:16 AM   #1353
Starbucks
FFR Player
 
Starbucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Whoever on D0 introduced the idea of linguistic analysis, fucking thank you, because with that in my mind I was able to find the acquisitioner by going over every single players' posts and looking for patterns in grammatical structure, term usage (using some kind of mental TF-IDF), and emotive responses

I conducted two kinds of analyses:

1) Within-players (looking at a single player's posting history as a function of time), and
2) Between-players (comparing posting histories to those of Wal-Mart's)

Yes, I did both analyses for all living players.

Part 1: Within-players analysis

In this analysis, I studied posting behaviors of individual players between D0 and D1. More or less, I noticed that most players were acting internally consistently. Two players came to my attention here:
a) IBM, and
b) Marlboro.

IBM was strange for me, because there very clearly were different writing styles between and within days. I actually almost thought it was him, except I realized that this player had replaced out multiple times, making it nearly impossible to perform rigorous analysis on this player (i.e. I didn't feel like doing that). If IBM is the acquisitioner, then replacing out over and over again literally is the best strat because I am refusing to look deeper into this player on this dimension.

With Marlboro, you will notice that they have exactly 4 posts at the time of EoD D1. There are three observations I would like to bring forth:

First, is this post from D1:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboro View Post
Obviously this freaked a lot of people out because first of all, Marlboro suddenly had shown up, at the BEGINNING OF THE PHASE, and made a reaction picture to the nightkills. It's weird, but not weird enough.

Second, is this post from D1:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboro View Post
Because he's a weird bodysnatching version of the Serial Killer. It's something even the wolves are afraid of. So we can sort of work together with scum to take him out.
People noticed this too: Marlboro comes out of fucking nowhere, talks about the acquisitioner, then provides no other meaningful content for the rest of the phase. Again, this is strange, but the lack of activity matches their D0 behavior.

However, this last post is the silver bullet, the singular fuckup that Marlboro made in his play:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboro View Post
I had a bad day, so my apologies if it took this long to pop in.
This is Marlboro's last post before today. I thought this was strange, because we can compare this to his first post ever:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboro View Post
Sorry for taking so long to get here.

I'll read up tonight and write some Quality Posts™ tomorrow (warning: Quality Posts may cause cancer)
Here we have two different vernaculars for the same expression: "sorry I'm late." In the first one, from the real Marlboro, he says "sorry for taking so long to get here." In the second one, he says "my apologies if it took this long to pop in."

Two completely different ways of saying the same thing, from two different days. It seems as though these two posts are coming from two different voices. That alarmed me.

This may seem like nitpicking. And this alone isn't damning information. That brings us to Phase 2.

Part 2: Between-players Analysis

Here, I looked at every single player's posting histories and compared them to Wal-Mart's. This was very hard, but it all became worth it when I stumbled upon these gems:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walmart View Post
Here's another example of Facebook popping in to make some restatement of a comment again

These pop-ins do not help my perception of you, mostly because you're not saying that you're going to be inactive, you're just sitting on the sidelines echoing what everyone else is saying. I still wouldn't be too happy if you said you were going to be inactive, but this just makes you look worse.


Thank you,

Sam Walton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walmart View Post
[color=black]
Why are you still on this topic? Why are you so worried about IBM's posting gimmick? What kind of pop in is this
The term popping in should seem familiar:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlboro View Post
I had a bad day, so my apologies if it took this long to pop in.
We have a winner!

One player's D1 posting doesn't match their D0 posting, but DOES match another player's D0 posting: the acquisitioner's.

Marlboro for emphasis.
Starbucks is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:18 AM   #1354
Starbucks
FFR Player
 
Starbucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Two points I would like to add here:

1) Two other players, Apple and Toyota, both have used the term "popping in", once from my recollection. The term is not married to Marlboro. Additionally, this is not the only term that Marlboro/Wal-Mart have used. My analysis is not infallible. However ---
2) I am not voting for Marlboro just for this analysis --- the main reason is because there were no acquisitioner kills.

If anybody wants to make the case that the acquisitioner made no kills tonight, I'm all ears --- otherwise, your ass is fucking mine, Marlboro.
Starbucks is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:18 AM   #1355
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

I like the work Starbucks.

I bet you lunch or dinner next time that its wrong though.

Bet is invalid if either of us are the acquisitioner or wolves.

Interested?
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:19 AM   #1356
Wells Fargo
FFR Player
 
Wells Fargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Also, how hard would you have cried if you died last night after doing player-by-player analysis on language? lmao
Wells Fargo is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:19 AM   #1357
Starbucks
FFR Player
 
Starbucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
I like the work Starbucks.

I bet you lunch or dinner next time that its wrong though.

Bet is invalid if either of us are the acquisitioner or wolves.

Interested?
What part of

the acquisitioner was stopped

do you not understand
Starbucks is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:21 AM   #1358
IBM
FFR Player
 
IBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Quote:
Originally Posted by GE View Post
you're not asking me, but I highly doubt it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells Fargo View Post
This is a tough question, but I think if they are in the wolf pile, they're trying to get out of it, so I think they would use their power, right?

But I don't really know the odds. We shouldn't be so lucky as to be looking for a SK-Wolf combo, especially with how this game has played out, so I'm inclined to say its not happening, but there is literally 0 logical reasoning there.

Starbucks, your 10 minutes is up.
I think the odds aren't terrible, and I disagree with the notion that being in wolf role would be something you'd wanna get out of.

Think of say how DBP played SK one game where he made no kills till later in the game. But this SK gets to say get into wolf chat and join the discussion, otherwise their cover would be blown.

Dumbing myself down a lot: I think the AQ is a player who'd think like I do, and aim for a target that puts them ahead at the risk of losing. The information you can gain out of that, and the safety net of being in the wolf circle with the option to leave at any time, is such a strong position to be in, especially if you can net it early game. And since they're not a wolf, and can play as if they're the SK bussing partners is easier for them to do at least once.

Does this make sense? It's a lot of speculation, but like I'm really sure this is the optimal play to abuse this role. They don't have to make a kill if they can help dictate the wolf kills. Though maybe our Vigi is the AQ ect.

This is why I feel mass claiming has a lot of shenanigans. Sure we solve for town, but we somewhat indirectly give the AQ a way to plan their pathing and leaves them room to abuse the role to the maximum extent.

Sorry about kinda throwing this out but it's like, the thing that racks my brain the most. We're netting wolves left and right, so I'm worried about the AQ a little more for at least a day.

It's a bit more than I should be thinking about maybe.
IBM is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:21 AM   #1359
GE
FFR Player
 
GE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

holy shit Starbucks. Nice work. Marlboro
GE is offline  
Old 06-9-2017, 12:22 AM   #1360
IBM
FFR Player
 
IBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 36
Posts: 5
Default Re: TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

Well geez, starbucks through a major wrench into my theory.

Not that I'm mad about it, holy crap.

I was looking at time posting on d1 to find outliers but man.
IBM is offline  
Closed Thread

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution