TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[IBM]

Or, that could be a thing, I suppose.

[IBM]

Helps if I remember flips were a thing, doesn't it?

[IBM]

A thought just occurred to me that I'm gonna withhold 'till EoD.

Someone ask me about it when we're less than 5 hours away please so I remember to share, it won't be immediate though.

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

This is an interesting sequence of posts.

I like you

also lowkey accusation of angleshooting for the written out posts of IBM. Why can't he play the game at the same level as everyone else? The world may never know

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by Visa

deal w it

iphone is no longer disgusting so here are some acquisitioner thoughts

acquisitioner is likely to go after inactives to make it easier

wouldnt be a bad idea to let them

alternatively we could start aggressively shooting inactives so that the acquisitioner cant hide

personally i prefer leaving the inactives to the acquisitioner since typically theyre going to be greenies

Excessive focus on not-wolf hunting, too? Visa could be the real deal

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Amazon

I like you

also lowkey accusation of angleshooting for the written out posts of IBM. Why can't he play the game at the same level as everyone else? The world may never know

You gonna apologize to me later.

[Amazon]

I would like to see Shell roleblocked.

I stand with Alibaba/Microsoft/Verizon/Wells as my townspeople, Facebook and Visa as my wolves, and a massive need to reread the thread. I'll dig in to ISOs etc. later on today.

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Amazon

Excessive focus on not-wolf hunting, too? Visa could be the real deal

Why would the AQ go after in-actives when they have better options?

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Amazon

I would like to see Shell roleblocked.

I stand with Alibaba/Microsoft/Verizon/Wells as my townspeople, Facebook and Visa as my wolves, and a massive need to reread the thread. I'll dig in to ISOs etc. later on today.

Page 14 is a good reread.

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by IBM

Why would the AQ go after in-actives when they have better options?

There's less constraint on their posting style the next day, and going from low activity to high can be a town tell. It's really not too predictable who they'd go after, other than not targeting people with highly idiosyncratic styles

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by IBM

Page 14 is a good reread.

You're on how many posts per page?

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Amazon

You're on how many posts per page?

Twenty.

Specifically the walmart post.

Also gonna ask because I haven't read to it yet, has Toyota kept using lots of "..." through the day?

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by IBM

Twenty.

Specifically the walmart post.

Also gonna ask because I haven't read to it yet, has Toyota kept using lots of "..." through the day?

Yeah, think so. Silly tactic

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by IBM

Twenty.

Specifically the walmart post.

Also gonna ask because I haven't read to it yet, has Toyota kept using lots of "..." through the day?

Oh, I don't plan on reading Walmart's posts, but I found it and read through that one. Reading a post a couple further down, Walmart was clearly trying to read the game and share their reads. Whoever asked if they can be trusted, I would say 99% assume Walmart's post was genuine in any one instance

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Amazon

I would say 99% assume Walmart's post was genuine in any one instance

How?

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Xiz

Im aware of my mistake for votecount. Luckilly the correct person died, so carry on.

This pun is bad and you should feel bad xiz.

[IBM]

Hi McDicks and the Heart Attack.

Guess the reference for townie points /jokin'

[IBM]

Originally Posted by Shell

...

Who in the flying HELL are you to know that?

I don't remember, but if it's the Richie you're referring to, then his FFR name use to be Zekramcross.

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Shell was not acquisitioned

Never thought I'd see that name pop up again wow rofl

Originally Posted by Starbucks

why are we hunting for the acquisitioner as a lynch target

Because if they're not a dipshit they're hunting for a wolf target and not an inactive.

[Amazon]

Originally Posted by IBM

How?

I think they were trying to identify players in the game and read them based off that. Pretty high level of effort/weird way to phrase a read if they're just looking to make it to night uninterrupted

[Visa]

if i was the acquisitioner going after inactives would be my default plan to stay alive

why amazon be scum reading me

that aint right