TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Visa]

Originally Posted by China Mobile

Above poster indicates Visa's neglect of game rules. China Mobile task squad agrees with said analysis and would like Visa's feedback on the matter.

idk im only 11 u bagel

[Visa]

Originally Posted by Starbucks

Okay serious what the fuck is up with Visa this game?

In my previous post I quoted a bunch of posts where they were acting like a dumbass, and then this post betrays a kind of knowledge of the game I would expect from at least a regular TWGer

Posting a public callout in one post and then talking about "interactions" in another feels really offputting to me

visa what's your mindset

if this wasnt an anon game id be almost universally townread

google vote toyota
ge vote toyota

ge

i have a hunch as to who mcdonalds is and that clears him otherwise i still think hes scum

[Toyota]

Isn't it a bit against the spirit of an anon game to be basing... so much off of meta reads that can't even be confirmed, darling?

[Visa]

toyota

oh yeah thats right

shut up

[GE]

y'all outta your damn mind if you think I'm scum.
I've been trying to get things going, like pinging out Toyota. Not much things to get rolling being D0, but I'm doing what I can with muy schedule. I'll be more available come Monday.

[Shell]

Yeah, okay.

I'm gonna be the unpopular opinion and say I think Toyota is fine. It's not because they promised an investment or anything!

No, but seriously.

So they reacted to someone throwing some shade at them. Is that suddenly not normal?

✧

[Visa]

i think they were pr hunting in the thread which auto makes you a wolf

i honestly am tired of reading toyotas posts theyre so cringe

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Toyota

On a similar topic, the prior... troubles towards IBM, as well as their diligence in retaining a posting style that is difficult to replicate, leads me to push them as being non-VT; not sure whether that's red or blue, of course. I feel like it would especially be a babe in a seat of particular... power that would go to such a length, as to be an undesirable acquisition, because it would definitely be a crucial matter to not lose such an essential role.

Safe to assume you're referring to this post?

✧

[Visa]

yeah i think so

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Toyota

Oooh my, yes this is good, good... and this is true too. Though, I could still see even... further stress on not being taken over by a PR, be it red or blue.

The IBM as non-VT, dear, is to truly scope in on my thoughts, yes? I would sooner lean red than blue, mind.

Or maybe this one?

✧

[Shell]

Actually... now that I have them side by side.

...Says they didn't know. But then says "I rather lean red than blue."

Huh... why didn't I catch that initially?

✧

[Visa]

both of them are about ibm so they're just a continuation of the same thought really

[Shell]

Whoa, hold the phone. I think I see what you guys are hating about.

That's downright suspicious.

✧

[Shell]

For the safety our our company, Toyota. we revoke our offer until more information is released.

Apologies.

✧

[Toyota]

I am a bit... confused why there is contention about that.

I'd love to hear more so I can ease your... minds.

My line of thought is that I doubt a VT would go to such lengths... unless I have a poor perception on the true goal. I can understand some standard gimmicks, but what IBM did seemed a bit... over the top. Process of elimination then puts them as red or blue to me... but I would lean more as a team effort behind it... hence why I'm thinking red for him.

[Apple]

Originally Posted by Toyota

Isn't it a bit against the spirit of an anon game to be basing... so much off of meta reads that can't even be confirmed, darling?

You read uncomfortable. I can't tell how much of that is the style you're adopting.

[Apple]

Originally Posted by Shell

Actually... now that I have them side by side.

...Says they didn't know. But then says "I rather lean red than blue."

Huh... why didn't I catch that initially?

✧

They say in the paragraph after the first piece you quoted that they could see it being wolf-orchestrated.

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Apple

They say in the paragraph after the first piece you quoted that they could see it being wolf-orchestrated.

Be as it may, they still said "I don't know" and then go "would lean red than blue".

Except in reverse order, which is still kind of suspicious.

✧

[Shell]

Or maybe my tunnel is showing since some of you don't like Toyota.

Maybe I should just ignore that, because other than that, I think Toyota is fine still.

✧

[Toyota]

Originally Posted by Shell

Be as it may, they still said "I don't know" and then go "would lean red than blue".

Except in reverse order, which is still kind of suspicious.

✧

It's really a matter of being... not entirely sure, but still wanting my perception known.