|
|
#1941 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
*Waves to thesunfan*
|
|
|
|
|
#1942 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
. . . That's it?
|
|
|
|
|
#1943 |
|
scumfan is scared of aa
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 488
|
theoretically no OpieOP
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#1944 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
Like, I appreciate this scenario, I do, but erm...
What's the word, what's that word... *Ahem* ![]() Unnecessary... Yeah, that's the word! The scenario you presented just sounds way too convoluted to even be a possibility. What you're suggesting is he read how all the actions were going to be performed, withheld the kill and is calling a stack on shadowolfe. That IS what you're saying, are you not? |
|
|
|
|
#1945 |
|
Unacceptable
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
Continuing reads. The last few people will be up next, followed by vote analysis of the first two days (no one's actually looked at both days together yet, afaik, so it'll be interesting to see what turns up).
*** Charu: Un-CCed Bodyguard claim. Town. I'll elaborate on this one last time. Put simply, if there is an actual bodyguard/asceticizer out there who hasn't claimed, now's the time. Having said that, it's not going to happen. If it did, either anti-town Charu or anti-town CCer would lose. There's no way around that at this point. No one can CC falsely without losing the game either today or tomorrow. And a real CC would doom Charu either today or tomorrow, which is why he never would have made this as an anti-town gambit in the first place. He's town. psychoangel691: Replaced DBP, which led to some consternation all around, since DBP was being looked at suspiciously at the time. On iso, I mostly like the reads I'm seeing: they align pretty well with both what we know now and what I'm feeling, and it seems to be done through a mix of instinct and reasoning. The posts are pretty straightforward, so there's not a lot to parse, but the pushes on both Juckter and Haku yesterday would be pretty daring from a wolf. Irritated tone when pushed by MML and Xel today; that reads neutral to me. If psycho isn't town, then she's more likely to be SK than a wolf. A lot of the suspicion of psycho goes back to DBP, but it's hard to definitively read psycho because her posts are to the point: they say what they mean to say and nothing else. But I read more town than SK here for now. Precarious: Town. The people's champion. roundbox: Before I even iso, I'll say I'm left a little leery by how much his game has changed from Day 0 EoD. Roundbox won me to his side with his excellent end of D0, where he was very active, was making reads, and kind of saw the game the way I do in a philosophical sense. The problem is, he's been much more inactive since. People kind of busted on his "follow the vote" approach, but while I don't really have a problem with following the vote, he never really did anything with it. He looks better on iso than I expected, though, because even though his posts have become somewhat clipped, they're at least making assertions (well, the game-related ones are). I'm not sure if they're good assertions, but the activity isn't quite as bad as I had expected. I'd still like to see actual reads here, because I feel like he's been sort of coasting. I still read town, but I'm drifting in the direction of null. *** Bonus observation: #1575 looks hilarious in hindsight. |
|
|
|
|
#1946 | |
|
Unacceptable
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1947 | |
|
Accuracy Player
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Connecticut
Age: 30
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Even so, the fact his suspicion started with OMGUS is terrible. His case almost becomes filler and assumption at that point.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1948 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
But he said in that very same post that it's a possibility shadow was stacked.
...I have idea where you're getting that he didn't know he died. He was suggesting scenarios that the WOLVES were plotting. |
|
|
|
|
#1949 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
So, tell me Zenith, if he was the SK, why would he say that... and then kill shadowolfe himself, because that's what you're saying with...
...This statement |
|
|
|
|
#1950 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
...Or maybe I'm reading your post wrong, let me read it a fourth time, lol
|
|
|
|
|
#1951 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
This part is tripping me up.
|
|
|
|
|
#1952 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
for the record, I'm still here
almost done with my post |
|
|
|
|
#1953 | |
|
Unacceptable
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
You stated earlier that you're not good with mechanics, so I'll try to explain in more detail how that first paragraph could be pertinent. Shado claimed Vig. He stated that he would shoot Haku last night in order to prove himself. The most likely course of action is that he was killed with the anticipation that Haku's death would have cleared him. But there are other possibilities. If the wolves chose to withhold a kill, then there would only be two kills last night: Shado-->Haku, and whoever the SK targeted (although for all the wolves knew, Shado could have been the SK). This would have prevented Shado from being mechanically cleared. Under this scenario, there would be less than three kills, which could have theoretically left Shado vulnerable to accusations of using an anti-town kill as vig cover. Now, if Shado died, why is this relevant? Because in this scenario it wasn't the wolves that killed Shado, it was the SK. It's possible, albeit very unlikely (which I'll explain below) that the wolves choose to withhold a kill in order to frame Shado, not realizing that the SK would target him. Now, this is a very unlikely scenario for a whole bunch of reasons, I merely point out that it's technically possible. The main hangup is that Shado stated an intent during EoD to shoot Haku, a wolf. This would further buttress Shado's claim of a vig kill even in the absence of a third kill. Certainly we would examine the possibility of a block or a duplication or a misdirection, and it would also make it so Shado could only be a vig or the SK (I assume the wolves can't kill themselves) unless the very unlikely possibility of the SK targeting Haku despite Shado's claim came to pass (and why would it?). There's also the fact that such misdirection has questionable payoff at best, given that the wolves would be essentially sacrificing a night kill for the very limited benefit of maybe causing a mislynch the next day. And of course if the SK did target Shado, they would waste a nightkill for nothing. Obviously, this scenario is the most unlikely, and I dismiss it as such. I simply note that it's one possible permutation for what happened last night. I eagerly await an actual response to my case against you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1954 |
|
Role Tide
|
Psycho (1)- Xel
dfr (1)- Prec Prec (1)- Zenith
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#1955 |
|
Unacceptable
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
I'm going to make dinner and watch football, but once I'm done cooking I'll just keep my laptop by me while I'm watching so I'll be able to work on my last isos.
|
|
|
|
|
#1956 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
Code:
execute followthevote.exe LOADING ... ... READY! DFR Charu psychoangel prepreprecarious MixMasterLarDude XelNya raeko TL;DR |
|
|
|
|
#1957 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
and to make a "current standings" list, here we go:
Charu (obv) Psychoangel / Raeko Zenith Precarious DFR Xel MML |
|
|
|
|
#1958 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
forgot to drop the MML vote
|
|
|
|
|
#1959 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
I am playing in another tournament starting some time between 8-9 PM server time and I'm hoping to be back in time
me moving my vote will be difficult |
|
|
|
|
#1960 |
|
fhqwhgads
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,029
|
man this thread is bumpin'
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|