07-23-2014, 11:25 AM | #1401 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Quote:
Coming out as the bomb is THE WORST play for the bomb to make. Now they wont be targeted by the wolves ever. You force the villians to choose between real or fake, somethign we can't comfirm without lynching you. Solid play for wolf under pressure to make, worst play for villian under pressure to make.
__________________
|
|
07-23-2014, 11:26 AM | #1402 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Really hope one of you that came out as Bomb is actually a Medic. That would be sweet.
__________________
|
07-23-2014, 11:29 AM | #1403 | |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Evolving this:
Quote:
2) TWG Captain Hook 3) TWG Hopper 5) TWG Darla ---would bet Darla or Yzma for MW 6) TWG Gantu 9) TWG Jafar 10) TWG Maleficent 12) TWG Randall Boggs 13) TWG Charlez Muntz 15) TWG Shere Khan 16) TWG Sid Phillips ----- Want to leave bomb claims alone. Would lean Ursula as fake 18) TWG The Queen 19) TWG Ursula ----- Want to leave bomb claims alone. would lean Ursula as fake. 20) TWG Yzma ---would bet Darla or Yzma for MW I'd pretty much guarentee one wolf in Muntz/randall. I think we should eliminate both before we go into counterclaims/MW hunt. #shoot Muntz/Randall.
__________________
|
|
07-23-2014, 11:32 AM | #1404 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 140
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
re: day 4, i think we kill ursula. im struggling with this because this is sort of a mystery game, we know possible roles but we dont know anything about how the setup is generated. the reaction from ursula to sid's counterclaim looks pretty good to me, considering that there could maybe possibly be 2 bombs. the initial claim looked hero to me, and ursula has been on my radar for a while.
ultimately, considering how many question marks there are in the setup, i dont think roleclaims can be free passes. i think u kill people who look scummy. ursula looks like the best kill. waiting on input from u all. i can shoot, or we can lynch without shooting, or u can lynch someone else without shooting anyone but i would be voting ursula. take ur pick!!! |
07-23-2014, 11:33 AM | #1405 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 140
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
i could live with this, seems like charles is a dead man walking so i could take that shot. waiting on more input
|
07-23-2014, 12:34 PM | #1406 | |||||||||
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Randall:
Most inactive player in the game. Least pressure. Suspicious. Wolves should be hopping all over this easy lynch target. Shere Kahn has received more hate, and he has at least one or two posts that are useful. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Muntz: When you get a vigi kill you should do some of your own digging and analysis. I just don't see it in Muntz's posts. I see a hard step away from shooting Auto (who was pretty generally agreed on before the change in targets). To the "inactives" pile, which seems like it was subjectively made. I had like 60 posts at the time I shouldn't have been even on that list, let alone being considered a prime candidate to be shot on the basis of inactivity. Shere kahn only has like 15 posts, but of the three that have words in them, he directly callsout Auto as a phony. Randall may be a hero, and despite being included in that list, and brought up by almost everyone: Quote:
1 - Jafar Quote:
1 - Jafar 1 - Gaston 3 - Randall 2 - Gaston 1 - Jafar Quote:
2 - Gaston 2 - Jafar Quote:
3 - Gaston 2 - Jafar Quote:
Why the moment I show up in the thread and see I have a gun pointed at me do you back off of me and post this: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You don't go "I'm pretty positive this guy is a Hero" Whoops let me shoot this random inactive instead!
__________________
|
|||||||||
07-23-2014, 12:36 PM | #1407 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
I'm back to feeling confident about #ShootMuntz.
__________________
|
07-23-2014, 12:53 PM | #1408 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 167
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
funnily enough, I don't think we've seen CHarles Muntz viewing the thread since last night
did he say he wasn't gonna be online, or are we at the stage now that he realizes anything he says will be used against him and is just viewing anon-ly also i think it's kinda funny how randall is a chameleon character and is most likely anon also |
07-23-2014, 01:07 PM | #1409 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
shooting randall would be a giant waste of time if he's villain, suspicions about him have been raised across the board and his posts basically give no read possibilities
i think i made it clear that i am perfectly okay with shooting charles, especially since he basically said "no comment" just like auto did i still want to see ursula get shot tho cuz there's no way she's villa (fucking duh) or medic (why would putting yourself at risk help as a fucking medic, as opposed to |
07-23-2014, 01:56 PM | #1410 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 167
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
k so that fantastical thought I had last night was that ursula's an oracle
baiting a kill on herself so we could get a full card flip but idk if that's worth it, just fucks things up and is prolly not worth it and that Queen was getting cold feet because she was afraid that Ursula would cardflip Queen as the godfather that's a ridiculous scenario though, sleepy-me was looking for something exciting it's more likely that either Sid or Ursula is a hero fake-claiming i would say we SHOOT Ursula and then lynch CHarles |
07-23-2014, 01:58 PM | #1411 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 167
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
|
07-23-2014, 02:03 PM | #1412 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
What about shoot charles lynch randall, deal with bombs tomorrow?
__________________
|
07-23-2014, 02:37 PM | #1413 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
i'm just gonna vote charles because there's no way i'm letting him live past today
|
07-23-2014, 02:46 PM | #1414 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
randall flipping villain would be the most useless flip possible
him flipping blue (unless he's oracle) would be the worst flip possible |
07-23-2014, 02:47 PM | #1415 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
meant to say most useless/worst lynch, meh
|
07-23-2014, 02:49 PM | #1416 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Randall making it to late game would be worse.
__________________
|
07-23-2014, 02:56 PM | #1417 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
i'm not gonna doubt that at all, i'm just wondering if taking care of randall is really more important than dealing with the two bomb claims
|
07-23-2014, 02:59 PM | #1418 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 140
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
hey guys, looks like its an echo chamber in here. theres more reservation on ursula so im thinking bullet gets delivered to the head of charles. sending kill in 30 minutes, speak now or forever hold ur codpiece
|
07-23-2014, 03:00 PM | #1419 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
Honestly, I'd back off Randall if Charles flips villian. Most of my Randall hate is coming from how Charles didn't shoot him despite Randall having the most votes for him.
Shoot Charles, if he flips hero lynch Randall. Shoot Charles, if he flips villian lynch Ursula. What do people think about that?
__________________
|
07-23-2014, 03:02 PM | #1420 |
Forum User
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 141
|
Re: TWG CXX: Villains United
To my knowledge, we still haven't figured out if the game could generate two bombs. Hypothetically, if we knew the game could generate a cop/gunsmith/bomb/bomb setup would you still be up for killing Ursula?
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|