05-29-2014, 11:49 PM | #61 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
I don't think anyone should have a free pass day 1, myself included. There really hasn't been anything here to go off so far for anyone so I don't have much to say for now. I'm waiting for the invite for the slack.
|
05-30-2014, 12:12 AM | #62 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
lol it was before we even read our role pms xD
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 12:21 AM | #63 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
I'm doing it for two reasons
one is because its her first game back and I want her to at least live for this long. Plus she's my only human lean other than cedo. |
05-30-2014, 01:40 AM | #64 | |
Admiral in the Red Army
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Quote:
You should not say "I want to be considered for the lynch." Calling Wolf #2 as psychoangel. WHO ELSE WANTS TO SAY SOMETHING
__________________
|
|
05-30-2014, 10:12 AM | #65 | |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Quote:
Calling Afrobean for wolf #3 |
|
05-30-2014, 10:24 AM | #66 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
So the night phase seemed to run past the deadline. I'm not trying to meta-analyze this too much, but what happens if the bomber doesn't make a choice by the deadline? It doesn't seem like you can just skip it. Is it an RNG roll for who gets chosen, or is the deadline just extended? I'd like to do a little online/offline investigation for last night if not.
|
05-30-2014, 11:25 AM | #67 | |
nobody fiffers anymore.
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Quote:
__________________
~ OFFICIALLY RETIRED FROM FFR THE GAME AND FFR TWG ~
Thanks for the memories, folks. u da bes |
|
05-30-2014, 11:54 AM | #68 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Who's wolf #1 then? IS THAT A SLIP!?
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 12:02 PM | #69 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
|
05-30-2014, 12:45 PM | #70 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Welp I'm obv wolf now damn.
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 12:48 PM | #71 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
I'm not saying I -want- to be, but I think it's silly to just give someone a free pass when there's been nothing at all to go off so far.
|
05-30-2014, 12:49 PM | #72 | |
Fractals!
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Quote:
|
|
05-30-2014, 01:16 PM | #73 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
kayla did something that no one has done since 104 for me; maybe its silly but its really rare for someone to talk to me before I talk to them (This was before I became the bomber) so I'm gonna just say that she was ready to talk about the game. Its not much and its mainly because I just want her to play b/c she's a very underrated player from both alignments, but I want to see more from her.
|
05-30-2014, 01:17 PM | #74 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
btw I never expect you guys to blindly follow me and I hate it when confirmed humans do that so yeah you guys don't have to listen to me though I would appreciate it if you did if I make good points and such.
|
05-30-2014, 01:38 PM | #75 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Don't worry, we didn't blindly follow Hans last time since he pretty much didn't say shit. But I am expecting a better leadership role from you sunfan.
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 01:39 PM | #76 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
we couldn't really blindly follow him for the lynch though *wink*
|
05-30-2014, 01:40 PM | #77 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
sunfan is already doing better than hans, now all he has to do is hit a wolf.
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 01:40 PM | #78 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Oh I think I get it now.
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 01:43 PM | #79 |
moonchild~
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
@Tps; this was during the night. May be way I may not have considered it.
__________________
|
05-30-2014, 01:43 PM | #80 | |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG CXVI-2: Revengeance
Quote:
one: if the bomber dictates who the town votes for, the wolves can just blend in and two: just because you're guaranteed human doesnt mean your reads are foolproof.
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|