Queue/Batch Discussion Thread - Page 840

**jimerax** · 12-14-2010, 03:24 AM

qqwref: thx, also can you judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour too if possible?

who_cares973 · 12-14-2010, 04:24 AM

+-9
+.-7
+?-2
?-3
--5

Maybe a bit too lenient hehu

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 04:40 AM

Just like there's one hard judge for each sector, there's also one really lenient one for each sector as well. So all in all, it might work out pretty evenly.

**jimerax** · 12-14-2010, 04:50 AM

Judge's strictness is always considered for team arrangement, so yeah.

Overall judges could be a bit more strict in ratings though, since +(5/5) is basically the highest rating.
(not applied for some strict judges)

Possible acceptance criteria this time.
(1) 18pts or 3+s
(2) [17pts and 2+s] or 3+s

who_cares973 · 12-14-2010, 06:28 AM

I use a /10 rating

1-2= -(-- is pointless and disrespectful)
3-4=?
5-6=+./+?(depending on file vs song potential)
7+=+

So some of those +'s weren't as strong as others

**qqwref** · 12-14-2010, 11:25 AM

bmah: Alright, I'll PM you when I'm done.

jimerax: Sure, doing a few extra files is no problem.

EDIT: Done :> Maybe I gave out too few extreme ratings, I dunno.
+ 5
+. 8
+? 9
? 2
- 2

**Plan_Bsk81127** · 12-14-2010, 06:32 PM

Now we only need one more persons notes. =]

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 06:43 PM

Thanks, you're quick qqwref!

- you might need to fiddle around with the ratings next time
- lol do you have headphones/earphones?
- I like the details; specificity is great
- you're pretty technical - didn't see "fun" as a common descriptor in your notes
- only one judge left

**TC_Halogen** · 12-14-2010, 06:55 PM

I'm willing to bet that the [++] I gave in my group is different from the other [++]'s.

**qqwref** · 12-14-2010, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

- you might need to fiddle around with the ratings next time

I could definitely be significantly more strict about certain things, but I did feel like a lot of the files were in the middle, not good enough to make the queue without changes, but not bad enough to straight up reject.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

- lol do you have headphones/earphones?

I have earbuds, but I don't generally turn up the sound all that loud. Why?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

Thanks, you're quick qqwref!
- I like the details; specificity is great

Thanks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

- you're pretty technical - didn't see "fun" as a common descriptor in your notes

Really? I used that word 9 times (of 26 files). I just didn't often point out when things were *not* fun.

**i love you** · 12-14-2010, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TC_Halogen

I'm willing to bet that the [++] I gave in my group is different from the other [++]'s.

I have a feeling we got the same thing o.o

who_cares973 · 12-14-2010, 07:05 PM

Aj ++ rockhill

**TC_Halogen** · 12-14-2010, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who_cares973

Aj ++ rockhill

Great guess

**i love you** · 12-14-2010, 07:09 PM

gg carlos

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qqwref

I could definitely be significantly more strict about certain things, but I did feel like a lot of the files were in the middle, not good enough to make the queue without changes, but not bad enough to straight up reject.

Oh, I'm just making comparisons from the notes of other judges, which is what jx did last time for an -approximate- measure. Independent from ratings, it's good to hear though that you express similar sentiment in opinions however (not that you have to, but it's so much easier when everyone agrees, right?).

Quote:

Originally Posted by qqwref

I have earbuds, but I don't generally turn up the sound all that loud. Why?

Several cases you appear to have difficulty hearing certain things, but in the other notes I have, those difficulties are noticeably absent. Turn up the sound! x)

Oh yeah, it's good to note when something isn't fun just as much as it is to note the converse.

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 07:37 PM

Uh oh, looks like a few songs were skipped.

@Patashu: review "Waltz in the Rain"
@qqwref: review "-Glorious Morning-" (also, you didn't need to judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour)

thx

**Plan_Bsk81127** · 12-14-2010, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimerax

qqwref: thx, also can you judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour too if possible?

^

He was asked to. lol

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 07:45 PM

Ok, that's weird.

edit: I c, jx

**qqwref** · 12-14-2010, 08:47 PM

You say I have difficulty hearing certain things, which is fine if the notes are there, but sometimes I use "I can't hear this note" to mean "as far as I can tell that isn't there". Could just be me, could be an error on the part of the file author. And I'm not sure whether I support stepping something that is hard to hear if it's there at all - I generally prefer for files to go to what I would hear when I play it, even if it means a slight loss of technicality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

@qqwref: review "-Glorious Morning-"

Alright, sent.

**bmah** · 12-14-2010, 09:03 PM

Got it, thanks. (that was fast again)

Of course, but I'm referring to stuff that I do indeed hear without even headphones on 1.0x rate, so maybe you do need some volume adjustment.

12-14-2010, 03:24 AM	#16781
jimerax ★_★★^★★ Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tokyo Posts: 8,185	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread qqwref: thx, also can you judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour too if possible?

12-14-2010, 04:24 AM	#16782
who_cares973 FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: :U Age: 37 Posts: 15,407	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread +-9 +.-7 +?-2 ?-3 --5 Maybe a bit too lenient hehu __________________

12-14-2010, 04:40 AM	#16783
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 37 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Just like there's one hard judge for each sector, there's also one really lenient one for each sector as well. So all in all, it might work out pretty evenly.

12-14-2010, 04:50 AM	#16784
jimerax ★_★★^★★ Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tokyo Posts: 8,185	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Judge's strictness is always considered for team arrangement, so yeah. Overall judges could be a bit more strict in ratings though, since +(5/5) is basically the highest rating. (not applied for some strict judges) Possible acceptance criteria this time. (1) 18pts or 3+s (2) [17pts and 2+s] or 3+s

12-14-2010, 06:28 AM	#16785
who_cares973 FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: :U Age: 37 Posts: 15,407	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread I use a /10 rating 1-2= -(-- is pointless and disrespectful) 3-4=? 5-6=+./+?(depending on file vs song potential) 7+=+ So some of those +'s weren't as strong as others __________________ Last edited by who_cares973; 12-14-2010 at 06:32 AM..

12-14-2010, 11:25 AM	#16786
qqwref stepmania archaeologist Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 36 Posts: 4,092	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread bmah: Alright, I'll PM you when I'm done. jimerax: Sure, doing a few extra files is no problem. EDIT: Done :> Maybe I gave out too few extreme ratings, I dunno. + 5 +. 8 +? 9 ? 2 - 2 __________________ Best AAA: Policy In The Sky [Oni] (81) Best SDG: PANTS (86) Best FC: Future Invasion (93) Last edited by qqwref; 12-14-2010 at 06:25 PM..

12-14-2010, 06:32 PM	#16787
Plan_Bsk81127 snooches Join Date: Aug 2007 Age: 34 Posts: 6,420	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Now we only need one more persons notes. =]

12-14-2010, 06:43 PM	#16788
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 37 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Thanks, you're quick qqwref! - you might need to fiddle around with the ratings next time - lol do you have headphones/earphones? - I like the details; specificity is great - you're pretty technical - didn't see "fun" as a common descriptor in your notes - only one judge left

12-14-2010, 06:55 PM	#16789
TC_Halogen Rhythm game specialist. Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Bel Air, Maryland Age: 34 Posts: 19,376	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread I'm willing to bet that the [++] I gave in my group is different from the other [++]'s. Last edited by TC_Halogen; 12-14-2010 at 06:58 PM..

12-14-2010, 07:05 PM	#16792
who_cares973 FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: :U Age: 37 Posts: 15,407	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Aj ++ rockhill __________________

12-14-2010, 07:09 PM	#16794
i love you Live a wonderful life~ Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,313	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread gg carlos __________________ =============================== The idea that RDCP 3 may come out in the future is a fun thought to have~ =============================== Last edited by i love you; 12-14-2010 at 07:11 PM..

12-14-2010, 07:37 PM	#16796
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 37 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Uh oh, looks like a few songs were skipped. @Patashu: review "Waltz in the Rain" @qqwref: review "-Glorious Morning-" (also, you didn't need to judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour) thx

12-14-2010, 07:45 PM	#16798
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 37 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Ok, that's weird. edit: I c, jx Last edited by bmah; 12-14-2010 at 09:43 PM..

12-14-2010, 09:03 PM	#16800
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 37 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread Got it, thanks. (that was fast again) Of course, but I'm referring to stuff that I do indeed hear without even headphones on 1.0x rate, so maybe you do need some volume adjustment.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 19 (0 members and 19 guests)