|
|
#16341 | ||
|
Ask Nuro! x3
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England.
Age: 34
Posts: 2,588
|
My file isn't there, can I re-send?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#16342 |
|
FFR Player
|
those are the files that were sent to nsanes email address. if you sent your file to the new email then you should be fine
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16343 |
|
VICES
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 32
Posts: 10,042
|
Thanks for clarifying guys. SF is going to fix it up and re-send it. It just seemed quite unfair to reject a song due to one's personal dislike of the music.
Cut and other comments are noted and will be applied and re-sent. |
|
|
|
|
#16344 | |
|
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Quote:
Yea I'm still getting used to the system over here for ratings. I got too used to the s,a,b,c,d we used on DF lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16345 |
|
FFR Player
|
only song that was rejected because of song choice was its raining lolis and it deserved it
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16346 |
|
.... :.. .:. ::
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,040
|
@jimerax
please ignore the files I sent to NSane and use the ones I sent to the new email please ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16347 |
|
Dark Chancellor
|
maybe i would use "has potential +?" more since I'm usually more tempted to reject or accept straight up
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#16348 |
|
Snek
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 35
Posts: 9,195
|
File submitted. Only file I've written in the past 5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
#16349 |
|
shots FIRED
Global Moderator, User Support
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 37
Posts: 8,448
|
It's probably more useful to announce a deadline date for submissions once files from the now-finished batch are accepted (how's the status quo so far?) and presented to the public. After all things are considered, everyone else can send in resubmissions as necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
#16350 |
|
★★★★★
|
So here's acceptance criteria idea.
(1) 13 or higher for Group1, 4, 12 or higher for Group 2, 3 (33 files) (2) 12 or higher for every group (41 files) As for this this time, (1) seems better imo. opinions? |
|
|
|
|
#16351 |
|
shots FIRED
Global Moderator, User Support
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 37
Posts: 8,448
|
(2) would make your post on judge reliancy pointless; it uses a "benefit of the doubt" approach on file acceptance. Seeing how (1) in general incorporates your assessment on the judges, this would make more sense to follow.
|
|
|
|
|
#16352 |
|
★★★★★
|
k leaning to (1) anyways.
added notes about resubmission and submission cap. |
|
|
|
|
#16353 |
|
FFR Player
|
Id also prefer (1) for the reason mentioned
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16354 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 138
|
lol nsane totally missed the first email I sent. So should have 5 files haha
|
|
|
|
|
#16355 |
|
missa in h-moll
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: nyc
Age: 30
Posts: 3,997
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#16356 |
|
Rhythm game specialist.
|
@ JX: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
#16357 |
|
stepmania archaeologist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 4,092
|
I think it is more important to have a relatively-consistent minimum quality of accepted files than to have the right *number/percent* of files get accepted. I'd rather get to play 100% of the Best Batch Ever and 0% of the Worst Batch Ever than 30% of each.
__________________
Best AAA: Policy In The Sky [Oni] (81) Best SDG: PANTS (86) Best FC: Future Invasion (93) |
|
|
|
|
#16358 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 35
Posts: 1,823
|
Sending creature tonight and fixing up My Half, seriously this time lol
|
|
|
|
|
#16359 |
|
★★★★★
|
We have nearly 60 now, so setting the submission deadline.
Nov 26, 2010 ps accepted 33 files from previous batch. |
|
|
|
|
#16360 |
|
FFR Player
|
awesome
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 13 (0 members and 13 guests) | |
|
|