FFR Scores 2006-2010

[Myattboy]

Dont think i want to work towards becoming a top player anymore, all the agro doesn't look fun lol.

Nice scores everyone, ill post somethings once i get back my rhythm.

[MrRubix]

Originally Posted by i love you

I would say something to completely destroy what you just said to me with proof but I'm just going to lay back and let you have your fun until the perfect time comes to finally use it. I was going to post it but you're just going to continue to call me dumb on your response to it since you're so repetitive with your responses.

Anyway, I'm going to end this now to prevent him from trolling. You guys can continue posting scores now before he strikes again.

PS: I love how you assumed that i wasn't there on BTV when you and TC_halogen were on playing RATO and other files hehe.

EDIT: Also, consider doing what i just said to you and maybe I'll have second thoughts about your scores.

Oh, no, go ahead and use it. I'd love to see what you consider to be a decent argument.

If I am repetitive with my responses it is only due to your consistent stupidity.

[MrRubix]

Originally Posted by One Winged Angel

The first 2/3rds of the song probably wouldn't take too long to master, as seeing even I've had runs where I've hit through the jumpjacks perfectly, so I'm assuming you only would've had to legitimately practice hitting the 24th trills onwards until the slow section, and then everything past the slow section sectioned off into however many individual pieces you saw fit...but again, any amount of time I would 'blindly' attribute to how long you've spent optimizing how to hit the 24th trills, the jumpgluts, the 32nd trill, or what have you, would be a pure guess, because I'm already nowhere near your level of skill...but the fact of the matter remains, the chances of AAA'ing the file after you've successfully optimized each section still seems ridiculous due to the incredibly high possibility of human error, although again, I know this point isn't completely valid because it doesn't completely nullify the possibility of a perfect run occurring.

8 clean is insane, yes, that's still a long way away from a AAA, so in my eyes, I don't believe that should be occurring anytime soon.

Agreed on all points.

[Xayphon]

Originally Posted by smartdude1212

That was better than reading a book of Garfield comic strips.

this

[Tarrik]

ITT FFR Beasts Post Whore.

[i love you]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

Oh, no, go ahead and use it. I'd love to see what you consider to be a decent argument.

I would but I'm not about to repeat what you just caused this thread to become. Right now would not be the perfect time seeing that you're so blind at the moment.

If I am repetitive with my responses it is only due to your consistent stupidity.

My consistent stupidity? HA, don't get me started. You said the same thing to everyone else who proved you wrong. Oh NVM -- "I'm making more money then you so I'm consider better and smarter then you." Okay guys, lets all listen to Rubix since he's so 'right' about everything!

Meh, I'm getting bored with this. Let's get back on topic.

[MrRubix]

If you think you're so right then, then let's see your supposed "proof."

Because I've been sitting on loads of proof for eons now. What do you have besides Texan stupidity? Nobody in this thread "proved me wrong" either BTW so I have no idea where you get off with that (actually false, I know exactly why you'd say such things).

Feel free to quote instances in this thread where I've been "proven wrong."

[Fast Fingered Fiend]

Rubix loves the cock



on topic: I got 28g and 2 misses on BB Evolution and 11g and some random cbs on Saddest RMX. I lagz which is why I didn't AAA bb evolution or sdg'd saddest

[leonid]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

Feel free to quote instances in this thread where I've been "proven wrong."

Originally Posted by MrRubix

EDIT: Actually I take it back. I now have solid proof. You got some explainin' to do, Leonid.

I don't mean to attack you but yeah

Actually this was not in FFR scores thread so nvm

[Plan_Bsk81127]

Anyway.........

this song is meh, but decent score I guess


Im so bad at trills. D:


gay song fail


I am embarrassed at where I got the miss at.....


high miss count, but PA is good.

[awein999]

that's very good almost there and schmol pa

[bob bob]

fc grind

if that miss is where i think it is ,you suck :P

[MrRubix]

Back on topic, OWA's post is correct. The first two thirds of the song (which is almost exactly 66% of the total stepcount by the time you hit the silence point before the first jumpglut) is practically AAA-fodder by now, with minimal human error. Most of the score variance comes from the ending gluts, and can kick the score anywhere from 10-35 Goods + change depending on the nature of how the final glut is handled. Moving from the 10-Good barrier down to 0-Goods barrier is exponentially harder because even a split-second screw-up can yield a ton of Goods from sheer stepcount alone. Trying to attack it earlier seems to help but it's almost impossible to really maintain that.

In other words, pushing 5 Goods would require a really, really, really solid run. Pushing 0 would require a ton of luck, at least for me -- and while I think I may be able to hit it someday, it certainly won't be anytime soon.

[MrRubix]

leonid: Poor example because the "proof" I was referring to at the time was totally correct in what I was noticing. It indeed required some further exploration which was addressed just fine.

[Fast Fingered Fiend]

30-1-1-16 on grand galop


Could teens if it wasn't for lag but eh

[leonid]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

leonid: Poor example because the "proof" I was referring to at the time was totally correct in what I was noticing. It indeed required some further exploration which was addressed just fine.

Then you worded 'proof' wrong, since if you had proof then you wouldn't even need me to go to VC and just conclude right away that I'm BS.

[MrRubix]

Originally Posted by leonid

Then you worded 'proof' wrong, since if you had proof then you wouldn't even need me to go to VC and just conclude right away that I'm BS.

You can still have proof of something that is typically BS that doesn't support the overarching conclusion. It's perhaps more accurate to say it was evidence of BS, but not proof of BS.

Also consider the post http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...5&postcount=77 where I basically echo the same thing.

[Fast Fingered Fiend]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

You can still have proof of something that is typically BS that doesn't support the overarching conclusion. It's perhaps more accurate to say it was evidence of BS, but not proof of BS.

Yeah, anybody remember Kepogata? Same **** as what is being discussed here

[MrRubix]

Kepo's thing was totally different.

What I am saying was that, if I recall correctly, you could see a replay of leonid's game and notice that everything was hitting the same damn frame (evidence of botting) -- but the truth of the matter is that he's just really, really accurate. Clearly that kind of observation is "evidence of BS" and needs further investigation.

[leonid]

It was actually that my accuracy was fluctuating like hell within the perfect window, but now that I recall, it was my keyboard's fault. (I switched keyboard this September so I think this doesn't happen anymore in my recent replays but I'm not sure)
God knows how I still managed to AAA stuffs lol