|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
|
:O
http://www.megagames.com/news/html/h...12mbcard.shtml We need a hardware forum. ps ps Suspected specs: 24 Pipelines 700MHz Core 256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR3 Memory 57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz) 32 Texture Units 96 Arithmetic Logic Units (ALU) 192 Shader Operations per Cycle 134.4 Billion Shader Operations per Second (at 700MHz) 300-350 Million Transistors 90nm Manufacturing Shader Model 3.0 ATI HyperMemory ATI Multi Rendering Technology (AMR) Performance Improvement of 3X Over Radeon X800 XT 16x stochastic FSAA FP32 blending, texturing HOLY SHIT 24 PIPES SDFIOSDHFISOFUDIOSSSK |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
|
You and me both
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
FFR Player
|
Old. We've known about this for what, two days? Not that impressive, anyway.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
FFR Player
|
Worst thing is that it's being held down in texas
what kind of hicks play games down THERE
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
And it IS impressive :O noob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
XD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
FFR Player
|
Stepmania doesn't count.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
FFR Player
|
They hold the CPL down there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
FFR Player
|
I just noticed something
Quote:
........................................... asdfasdfasdf
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
FFR Player
|
No. That's an extreme overstatement, I can promise you. 8 extra pipes and ~150 Mhz faster core clock does not equate to 3 times the performance. Plus, by this point, Video Cards are being bottlenecked by processors anyway, since most games aren't completely GPU reliant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
FFR Player
|
That will change very soon with multicore processors.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
FFR Player
|
dang! it hurts my heart
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Small town, TN
Age: 33
Posts: 5,784
|
I don't know what most of that means...
...IT MUST BE GOOD!
__________________
So I've gone completely slack-ass and haven't done any work on creating games. =( In less-depressing news, I got a job for an online business (which sells non-electronic games, of all things!) which has taught me a lot about marketing online and all that jazz. So now I'm on Twitter @NoahWright. And I write the blog for their website. Plus I do cool programming in-house that you'll never see. =O |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
FFR Player
|
I think my head just imploded from the complexity of what Anti just said.
Can I have a translation of that for nooblets like me?
__________________
"That last post was like a flashbang grenade packed with concentrated stupid." -Coolhand, LUEser |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
FFR Player
|
No. Even if it was translated, you still wouldn't get what we were talking about.
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
FFR Player
|
If by more efficient you mean that they are 64 bit while Pentium still isnt, they are going to go 64 aswell, while multicore and cell processors will surely bring them ahead unless AMD does the same. I've not heard of Pentium's memory bandwith problems, whats this?
I don't think video cards are going to giantly leap ahead of CPUs. PCI Express recently rolled around and with a top of the line duel GPU Radeon run on this huge new bus had a variety of games fps preformance increase =<10fps while costing an insane amount more. I think cell processors are going to leap CPUs ahead, expecially as the PS3 is going to have this next year and the entire console is shooting for a price range around 400 dollars while the performance increases of the CPU is very significant.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|