Impossible to answer?

[Shaydow]

Originally Posted by Patashu

No, the paper is the entirety of its two dimensional universe; folding it in a third dimension is more representative of the kind of geometrical/topological transformation it goes through, not an indication of higher space it goes through.

The analogy is imperfect, as are all analogies. Don't take it at its face value but grasp the concept I am trying to convey.

Understanding what your trying to say aside, it's a concept many of us won't be able to identify with. I'm also a firm believer in " always something on the other side ". The original person to ask you seems entirely correct, the folded space must still be sitting in something, even if that something is an infinite nothing.

Just a thought.

Peace,
Shay