Better? :/

**darkshark** · 12-29-2008, 02:05 AM

^^^^ Agree.

Font. It is the main focus of the picture, as it is supposed to be, I say you did a good job at that, because I really.....really....really hate people who make a signature that has their name blend in with the background....it defeats the entire point of it. BUT It should still flow well with the background, like Renevatia said, it lacks the coherency in the backgrounds. Making backgrounds that look cool doesn't cut it these days, take the time and create things that flow, this is a work of art, treat it like one.

Also....huge overuse on the bright stuff on the text.....at the very least make it a contrasting color with the background, not the same color in every single image.

Still not a bad attempt.

12-29-2008, 02:05 AM	#9
darkshark Nothing. Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: The Pacific Ocean Posts: 4,189	Re: Better? :/ ^^^^ Agree. Font. It is the main focus of the picture, as it is supposed to be, I say you did a good job at that, because I really.....really....really hate people who make a signature that has their name blend in with the background....it defeats the entire point of it. BUT It should still flow well with the background, like Renevatia said, it lacks the coherency in the backgrounds. Making backgrounds that look cool doesn't cut it these days, take the time and create things that flow, this is a work of art, treat it like one. Also....huge overuse on the bright stuff on the text.....at the very least make it a contrasting color with the background, not the same color in every single image. Still not a bad attempt. Last edited by darkshark; 12-29-2008 at 02:27 AM..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)