Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution > General Discussion > Critical Thinking
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-26-2004, 11:13 AM   #15
petterminator
FFR Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Default

Basically, the strings come from someone called something who noticed that the microverse (really tiny stuff) is not only weird, but downright impossible with the current definition of quarks as a "point" (zero dimensions, no length, nor width or depth). However, a lot of pieces fell into place if you replaced the points with strings (one dimension, still no width or depth, but length).

Now, I don't quite know why there is a need for all of those dimensions, but I should guess it has something to do with the vibrations needed to represent all the different qualities of the quarks.

About that "all matter are waves on a string": A bit off the mark, but pretty close. What the problem really was about in the beginning was how to define light; is it a stream of particles, or is it a form of radiation? Both are true. And the same goes for basically all forms of matter. As the mass of the matter increases, however, the wave-qualities recede and so far, the biggest object science has been able to prove has radiation-qualities is a Bucky Ball (as far as I know, anyway), which is a ball of carbon atoms, usually 60-70 of them.

That's how I've understood it anyways, if anyone's got objections, speak 'em. I'm no expert on these things.
petterminator is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution