|
|
#1 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Do you guys think there will be more speedmods on FFR3?
Well i hope =|... We should add Cmods on FFR3 or something >.<
__________________
Quote:
![]() HAHAHA XD I do n_n XDDDD ![]() :O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Vice President Of TGB
|
x1 2 3 are cmods. ffr x1 is c300 x2 would be c600. so uh yeah...
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
plain old ugly ass dumbas
|
I think the range of Speedmods should vary more.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
caveman pornstar
|
We need 2.25 and 2.5.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IREnpHco9mw |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
<<Insert Title Here>>
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 1,436
|
Would people use all of those speedmods though? Most people are just fine with x1.25 or x1.5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 529
|
I think x1.50 and x1.75 are the most widely used. Honestly, I think people would set it something to x1.68 and think they are having an easier time than x1.75 when in reality, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway. Not to mention that, on 30 FPS, I doubt you could even make such minute changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: N.C.
Posts: 459
|
I'm not most people...
I want a 2.25... Playing on 2.0 isn't what it used to be... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Giant Pi Operator
|
screenshrink with 2.0 then. it's not that hard. i had screenshrink down to a science a while ago. a small notch above hiding the text of the difficulty rating was my shrink.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
★★★★★
|
we don't need 3.0 anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
cohoooooon
|
I need 3.0x from time to time.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|