Were we better off in a state of nature?

[Master_of_the_Faster]

Originally Posted by devonin

On another forum where the entire philosophy section is cross-posted threads by Coberst, I think he's actually put me on some sort of ignore, or else he does a damn good job of ignoring every question, issue and request for clarification I post.

Given the attitude he presents in his posts about his motives, he's either blind, or a total hypocrite.

I think Coberst needs to read Politics and the English Language by George Orwell.

Edit:

Originally Posted by lord_carbo

To be honest I just skip over coberst's posts and read Kilroy's responses.

This is probably because Kilroy has actually shown decent points of view unlike Coberst who had not really brought up an argument at times.