We Met Dat Night -- First SM file

**Cyanite** · 06-28-2007, 12:14 AM

http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...p?songid=15716

First time I made a file not exclusively for FFR. Not used to making files this difficult, so I could use some criticism.

This also doubles as an example of my most recent work, just to show that the files that are by me in FFR right now don't really reflect on my current talent.

**The5thMoon** · 06-28-2007, 01:27 AM

I thought it was really fun, i really liked the last part. And just for kicks im going to post mai scoar.

**TheRapingDragon** · 06-28-2007, 04:49 AM

Not sure I want to download this purely because you've restepped a Vospi file. Care to say how you've improved upon his?

**DigitalS3r4ph** · 06-28-2007, 05:46 AM

It really isn't improved at all, other than the boring beginning that vospi cut out from his original file.

And the trademark Vospi piano stream at the end that made the file so fun was bastardized.

braintrust · 06-28-2007, 10:12 AM

This was an AMAZING attempt for a first file. There were a few minor sync problems, but most of the patterns themselves were done pretty well. I really liked the way you used jumps and freezes. Just keep working hard at it, especially the syncing. Practice really is the only way to get better at syncing (and even then, some people just aren't good at it).

**Cyanite** · 06-28-2007, 03:33 PM

uh, wait

I've made about 65 simfiles, this isn't my first attempt.. just my first file I didn't make with the intent to get it into FFR.

**DigitalS3r4ph** · 06-28-2007, 10:47 PM

Yeah overall this was a waste of time checking out XD Damn curiosity...

When you can safely say that your simfiles compare to works like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx1dD8Y9ksg or this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Bdr_e2o7Zo

THEN let me know so I'll try it out.

braintrust · 06-28-2007, 11:17 PM

Whoa, didn't see that (i'm too lazy to actually read the post, just read the title).

In that case, it was mediocre. A lot of the patterns were good, but the arrow placement wasn't special or fun (very repetitive) and certainly not an improvement (or comparison) to Vospi's original. It also felt offsync, mostly being the syncing, occasionally being the arrow placement (some 16ths instead of 24ths and such). The file wasn't horrible (better than, oh, Dog E's), but they weren't good enough to be in a decent pack.

MCRenaissance · 06-28-2007, 11:22 PM

Haha, and he bragged about his file. XD

**DigitalS3r4ph** · 06-29-2007, 10:54 AM

I was referring to Cyanite's.

Necros140606 · 06-29-2007, 05:10 PM

sorry dude try again

pick a brand new song the next time

06-28-2007, 01:27 AM	#2
The5thMoon • self-fulfilled prophecy • Join Date: May 2006 Location: Minnesota Posts: 2,132	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file I thought it was really fun, i really liked the last part. And just for kicks im going to post mai scoar. __________________

06-28-2007, 04:49 AM	#3
TheRapingDragon A car crash mind Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 36 Posts: 9,788	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file Not sure I want to download this purely because you've restepped a Vospi file. Care to say how you've improved upon his?

06-28-2007, 05:46 AM	#4
DigitalS3r4ph I'm Tsuka Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Hyperbolic Simfile Chamber Age: 36 Posts: 981	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file It really isn't improved at all, other than the boring beginning that vospi cut out from his original file. And the trademark Vospi piano stream at the end that made the file so fun was bastardized. __________________ PM me if you find the secret.

06-28-2007, 10:12 AM	#5
braintrust FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Right outsida Chi-town Posts: 182	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file This was an AMAZING attempt for a first file. There were a few minor sync problems, but most of the patterns themselves were done pretty well. I really liked the way you used jumps and freezes. Just keep working hard at it, especially the syncing. Practice really is the only way to get better at syncing (and even then, some people just aren't good at it).

06-28-2007, 10:47 PM	#7
DigitalS3r4ph I'm Tsuka Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Hyperbolic Simfile Chamber Age: 36 Posts: 981	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file Yeah overall this was a waste of time checking out XD Damn curiosity... When you can safely say that your simfiles compare to works like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx1dD8Y9ksg or this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Bdr_e2o7Zo THEN let me know so I'll try it out. __________________ PM me if you find the secret. Last edited by DigitalS3r4ph; 06-28-2007 at 10:51 PM..

06-28-2007, 11:17 PM	#8
braintrust FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Right outsida Chi-town Posts: 182	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file Whoa, didn't see that (i'm too lazy to actually read the post, just read the title). In that case, it was mediocre. A lot of the patterns were good, but the arrow placement wasn't special or fun (very repetitive) and certainly not an improvement (or comparison) to Vospi's original. It also felt offsync, mostly being the syncing, occasionally being the arrow placement (some 16ths instead of 24ths and such). The file wasn't horrible (better than, oh, Dog E's), but they weren't good enough to be in a decent pack.

06-28-2007, 11:22 PM	#9
MCRenaissance FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: SLC, UT Posts: 1,646	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file Haha, and he bragged about his file. XD __________________

06-29-2007, 10:54 AM	#10
DigitalS3r4ph I'm Tsuka Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Hyperbolic Simfile Chamber Age: 36 Posts: 981	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file I was referring to Cyanite's. __________________ PM me if you find the secret.

06-29-2007, 05:10 PM	#11
Necros140606 FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Italy Age: 35 Posts: 1,088	Re: We Met Dat Night -- First SM file sorry dude try again pick a brand new song the next time __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)