Nocilol

[Cavernio]

Kilroy_x: If it weren't for our emotions, existence wouldn't matter and there'd be no issue of morality at all!
I mean, in this particular topic, someone being sexually aroused by an actual child itself has little negative effect on the child's body; the negative effect is on the child's emotions and mind. Orgasm itself, although accompanied by the body's reactions, is very much intangible.

[Kilroy_x]

Originally Posted by Cavernio

Kilroy_x: If it weren't for our emotions, existence wouldn't matter and there'd be no issue of morality at all!

Well, maybe.

I mean, in this particular topic, someone being sexually aroused by an actual child itself has little negative effect on the child's body; the negative effect is on the child's emotions and mind.

Hmm. Good point. Perhaps then the issue is whether there is something wrong about letting a person consent to something that will hurt them when they aren't conscious enough to give informed consent. Or maybe the issue is whether consent is something neccessary at all. In this case, the physical act of taking the child to do something which will cause them emotional harm is the key to the immorality of the emotional harm.

I'm sure we can all agree though that even under this criticism, molestation is still very much wrong.

Orgasm itself, although accompanied by the body's reactions, is very much intangible.

Its causes are not, however.

Anyways, Nietzsche and perspectivism are stupid, but I don't see any reason not to try and use tools when I come across them.