|
|
#301 |
|
God
|
Because this is a mashing score, mirit?
A FC for songs like these should be a FC...Period. If it's under 20 boos, it should count. ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#302 |
|
Falcon Paaaauuuunch!!!!!!
|
Yes, but it's almost the exact same score as a mashing FC I got on it long ago your PA is so bad.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#303 |
|
God
|
That's still stupid because obviously the reqirement isn't just a FC, it's a FC + Good PA.
I FCed it and got under 20 boos. I should get points for that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#304 |
|
Giant Pi Operator
|
should lump get 5 points or w/e for FC'ing EHHS, then? does his FC of that song demonstrate the same skill level as, perhaps, ieat's FC of that song? nah, so PA requirements are good to have. plus, people can claim to have "FC'd a song but it had really really bad PA" in their lvlrank.php, with no real proof of full combo.
|
|
|
|
|
#305 |
|
God
|
Which makes absolute sense when comparing them because one is clearly mashed and one isn't....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#306 |
|
Falcon Paaaauuuunch!!!!!!
|
Ok, here's another thing for ya then. I just posted a BB Evo score in the FFR scores thread that had 97% of the record holder's score compared to your 95%, yet mine wasn't an FC and yours was, and you mean to tell me you deserve the FC points when my score doesn't?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#307 | |
|
God
|
Quote:
As of right now, there is no PA requirement for the FC of this song. The fact that the PA sucks doesn't make it any easier of a task to FC something like this and should still be counted.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#308 |
|
HAVE ME WITH VODKA
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Age: 32
Posts: 7,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
#309 |
|
( ̄ー ̄)
|
I FC'd Turbulence today. :3 ! Lol.
Just about.. 48 more points to go until I'm in Tier 4, though. T_T
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#310 |
|
The Dominator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Bay, ON
Age: 31
Posts: 8,875
|
Sorry but this is a point-based system...FC or not, it doesn't meet the requirement...the name FC is the only fitting name for it since most FCs would have points around that score % for that song....what else can we rename it to if it doesn't necessarily mean to FC something? "minimum score req" or "average FC req"?
|
|
|
|
|
#311 |
|
FFR Veteran
|
i dont see my name up there.. haha
|
|
|
|
|
#312 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 184
|
Instead of using the FC requirement, it could be 95-98% of max score on a song. I believe that 97% with 1 miss is better than a 95% FC.
|
|
|
|
|
#313 |
|
Falcon Paaaauuuunch!!!!!!
|
It is a certain percentage of the max score of a song, that's a lower percentage for harder songs, which all can be seen in the first post. I think the percentage way is better than just a flat FC requirement, since even if it's not an FC, you'd have to make up a LOT of PA to get the same score, and I also don't think FCs with less than a 3:1 ratio of perfects to goods like that hellbeat score should be worth much.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#314 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,580
|
haha im still on there. funny
|
|
|
|
|
#315 |
|
woah shrooms
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 3,864
|
9 more points until Tier 3
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#316 |
|
God
|
So in other news, I went and Pwned Hellbeat just to make you people happy (See FFR scores thread)....NOW will you add me to Tier 3?
__________________
Last edited by Ryusei_; 04-29-2007 at 09:57 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
#317 |
|
FFR's Buizel
|
I have 1 point and am proud of it.
|
|
|
|
|
#318 |
|
Falcon Paaaauuuunch!!!!!!
|
I disagree.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#319 |
|
FFR Veteran
|
i'm too lazy to attempt to get on the list
__________________
"AW MAN, WE SUCK AGAIN!" - Rob Schneider, The Waterboy (1998) |
|
|
|
|
#320 |
|
Giant Pi Operator
|
Vivi, nice idea, but that method promotes mashing, which we don't seem to condone here or praise, really.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|