-
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
I left all my money and laundry stuff in the communal laundry room because i was too focused on this game end meComment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
Hey mellon can you explain this post for me a bit more? Like, What do you mean by “showing you’re handling the pressure well”
Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
Mml:
Can you explain why ffa voting for an inactive, when you yourself, were saying lynching inactives within the first day/ two would be a good thing? How does that compare now that wayward flipped w?
If you’ve already touched on this itt then apologiesComment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
that sentence doesn't parseaka mikey
-----
Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
ffas main contribution is tunneling raeko which is not out of character but also not something i agree with. on the other hand, his eod's (with the exception of d0) haven't been that bad)
i literally forgot some people were playing LOLCan you also elaborate on why you distinguished between “forgot existed” and “null” on your d1 readsOriginally posted by MixMasterLarOriginally posted by the sun fan
Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
if it helps anyone, it's necessarily me or svaz (or me and svaz for those dorks) for wolf due to the lack of wolf rush on me
svazOriginally posted by MixMasterLarOriginally posted by the sun fan
Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
I just didn't quite understand why my responding to FFA's accusations was considered "bad"
There is always something to read or take from every single post in this game. Even though I wasn't taking his accusation very seriously at the time I still wanted to respond to give others the chance to read the situation. So that comment was me explaining my reasoning behind my responding to FFAComment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
it's based solely on your play. the read on dbp wasn't very strong to begin with, it was based on gut as we've both mentioned. So when you came in and looked good I take that over my relatively baseless gut read on dbp. But I will re-examine tomorrow if we are still aliveComment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
Svaz is a girl
My read on Svaz is a paranoia read because of a previous game. In a previous game, Svaz and Wayward were wolf partners and Wayward was about to be modkilled for inactivity. So, Svaz started a lynch on him and got him lynched, and since she was the first on the train, she looked great from it. Other players eventually figured her out but I was adamant that she wasn't a wolf and wouldn't do that. but she did, and now IS SHE DOING IT AGAIN????
Funny I just don't see as having very good interactions in thread. She hasn't given many definitive opinions about anything, and though her reads have been pretty consistent, they seem like pretty "easy" reads to make and never go too far out on a limb. Most of her posts are more on the commentary side of things and she doesn't seem to do much digging.Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
Raeko is town, man. Already explained my thoughts in that post it seems you didn't read (also asked for a massclaim)
Voting inactives because their bullshit = goodMml:
Can you explain why ffa voting for an inactive, when you yourself, were saying lynching inactives within the first day/ two would be a good thing? How does that compare now that wayward flipped w?
If you’ve already touched on this itt then apologies
Voting Wayward, who had no post, because you're building a case against him = dumb af
It's been determined that FFA is pretty town, that's where he sits for me. My wolves are between you, funny and Svaz.Comment
-
Re: TWG 190: Written in Blood and Betrayal - Game Thread
ftr I voted wayward cause one of the inactives was a wolf and shadowgod/svaz seemed townyaka mikey
-----
Comment
Comment