actually though, i'm gonna make a drank then say stuff about gradiant, then attempt to innundate the thread to see if he'll actually re-read everything
Originally posted by Charu
Only yours, for an easy price of $19.99! You too can experience the wonders of full motion rump sticking.
anyways, simply put, I felt like with all of his backpacking and antics and very stretched logic - there's one post that i'm too lazy to go and find where he says that i backed off of ck, and if you look at the posts, i've never backed off ck, i just simply switched gears over to other analysis then went to sleep. (obv, ck hasn't appeared since, and that's worrying, and i've already said that in some previous post)
ANYWAYS, i feel like with all i said above, it's like, he's trying to make an effort to not have his own opinions out there because they might draw attention to him. It's much easier when you're just kinda agreeing with other people's opinions (as a wolf), and can easily throw some other player under the bus when a lynch doesn't go through, via "this guy started it, he must have been pushing because he's a wolf i'm red blaster" (or some more refined logic)
anyways, i feel like as a wolf in general, and especially in this game as a whole so far, gradiant has been the one who feels the most reserved in his playing; see this whole interaction where i did ignore his question for a while - i don't think he felt safe going on the offensive because of trying not to stick out and such. If you look at pretty much everyone else in the game, it feels more or less natural the way people are interracting with eachother, but grad kinda tunneled in as soon as i did my stuff, ignoring even the previous accusations of backpacking, failing to explain or give reasons, not even "i was just agreeing with people, that's all"
basically, in the large scope of the game, imo grad sticks out the most atm
Originally posted by Charu
Only yours, for an easy price of $19.99! You too can experience the wonders of full motion rump sticking.
Well you have practically nothing to go off of for your first 10 posts or so. Once YoshL starts pinging CK out, you start wondering:
Then:
You blindly followed YoshL's voting pattern based off of Chris pointing out that storn was more active this game than last.
Soon after storn counters that with reasoning, you apologize for it, but a few posts later:
You trust my word and proceed to place a vote on him.
tl;dr, you've countered a bit of what you've said and I'm curious as to why you're going all Harvey Dent on us.
Breathin' down your skinny, little ass.
On the first quote, yeah who wasn't wondering that? Pretty sure everyone was taken by surprise by how CK reacted.
Second quote, I didn't blindly follow it. I gave a reason for why I was tempted to jump the bandwagon, a good solid reason. Chris didn't need to point out that storn is acting differently, I was in the last game. I already knew that.
I just innocently apologized for any false accusations I might be making. No big deal about that.
And third quote, I trusted your words because they were facts and based off the very reason why I already didn't entirely trust storn.
What you said just supported what I was already thinking. Which applies to the bolded sentence in the first quote.
They could be fact, but only if you had read them. You'd still need to trust my word on that if you hadn't (which is also assumption based).
Either way, as I said earlier, it's more of a gut read than anything. Mine usually suck so I'll keep it around, but not in the forefront now.
Especially now that YoshL just went nuts on Gradiant.
PS. That Obama grin is the best summary of my smirk ever.
Comment