Re: Serious Judging System Suggestion
Rebirth0, I would sit here and humor you, but I simply cannot because I have some Network Security homework I need to do, so I'm just going to summarize your post really fast.
a.) the judges group didn't falter because of it being too many files, they faltered because of miscommunications, and literally because of certain people's inability to just motivate themselves to do it. That's not a downfall of the team as a whole, that's the downfall of specific people. That is being addressed in the current reconstruction of the judgment system, and there is intent to hold judges accountable for issues like those in the future.
b.) Your statement regarding "pretty weak files" still getting in game really just makes it that much harder to listen to you, because you're being narcisstic and implying that you know better than others about what makes a good file and what doesn't. There are a lot of simfile artists here that have improved quite a bit, and I don't take kindly to you downing them when you hardly submit to the batch as it is. If you couldn't already see, I'm assessing your points as you bring them up, and I'm responding to them very clearly for you. I have no reason to sugarcoat anything -- I already know what happens when things are just allowed to try and fit in place. Assertion is clearly the way to get things done around here.
c.) The game getting massive is something that is uncontrollable with a game that has existed for 10 years. It is intimidating, but the solution to that doesn't revolve around file submissions because that count will continue to accumulate, and reduction in content hurts us now (and will hurt us later). If the game were to be purged or have yearly scoreboards/ranked files, and the list was growing, that's completely different. That is not the case.
If you want to bring up points for reconstruction like hi19 did, that is perfectly fine. However, ensure that your reasoning behind it is sensible.
Rebirth0, I would sit here and humor you, but I simply cannot because I have some Network Security homework I need to do, so I'm just going to summarize your post really fast.
a.) the judges group didn't falter because of it being too many files, they faltered because of miscommunications, and literally because of certain people's inability to just motivate themselves to do it. That's not a downfall of the team as a whole, that's the downfall of specific people. That is being addressed in the current reconstruction of the judgment system, and there is intent to hold judges accountable for issues like those in the future.
b.) Your statement regarding "pretty weak files" still getting in game really just makes it that much harder to listen to you, because you're being narcisstic and implying that you know better than others about what makes a good file and what doesn't. There are a lot of simfile artists here that have improved quite a bit, and I don't take kindly to you downing them when you hardly submit to the batch as it is. If you couldn't already see, I'm assessing your points as you bring them up, and I'm responding to them very clearly for you. I have no reason to sugarcoat anything -- I already know what happens when things are just allowed to try and fit in place. Assertion is clearly the way to get things done around here.
c.) The game getting massive is something that is uncontrollable with a game that has existed for 10 years. It is intimidating, but the solution to that doesn't revolve around file submissions because that count will continue to accumulate, and reduction in content hurts us now (and will hurt us later). If the game were to be purged or have yearly scoreboards/ranked files, and the list was growing, that's completely different. That is not the case.
If you want to bring up points for reconstruction like hi19 did, that is perfectly fine. However, ensure that your reasoning behind it is sensible.
Comment