|
View Poll Results: What do | |||
Abandon Roman Numerals | 9 | 47.37% | |
Keep Roman Numerals | 10 | 52.63% | |
FFR Staff/Admins need to play on alt accounts | 8 | 42.11% | |
FFR Staff/Admins don't need to play on alt accounts | 8 | 42.11% | |
I don't want there to be 2 games at once (People could play in multiple games) | 6 | 31.58% | |
I do want there to be 2 games at once (People could play in multiple games) | 7 | 36.84% | |
I don't like TWG its dumb (this option is for u, Dingles) | 4 | 21.05% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-25-2019, 11:00 PM | #1 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2017
Age: 29
Posts: 444
|
TWG Poll Questions
Just a few things, since its been a minute since the last TWG Poll.
Do we need to stick by roman numerals? Kinda feels silly at this point and the system looked cool for maybe the first hundred games, but now its just clunky imo. Do moderators/staff members NEED to play on other accounts? The advantages that moderators/staff accounts have over normal accounts are as follows: 1) the ability to see invisible users on the "Currently Viewing" bar on the bottom of each page 2) the inability to be put on the ignore list of another FFR account 3) the ability to see IP addresses (this is more useful in certain situations than others). They're all kind of minor and its a hassle for people to swap between accounts to be honest, and people definitely forget (Manti also got away with playing on his account because people kept forgetting to tell him to swap, definitely not me nope I didn't forget) How do people feel about 2 games running at once? I would like to see how this worked out. Maybe run the top 2 games that get votes, staggering the signups a week after. I think we could do it, and people wouldn't have to wait so long between games that they don't want to play.
__________________
TWG Stats: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing FFR is a pretty good place somehow. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|