FFR's Top One Handers

[Bynary Fission]

Originally Posted by Ponygonpwns

EDIT: Bluearrowll has it, so you should give it tiers, but a lot since probably he's the only one that has it.

I won't be giving it tiers, since even the great Blue had to mash a lot of songs to get 99+% (no offense, though it's true). I'm at like 82%.

Originally Posted by Crashfan3

I'm officially going to start working on my tier points now, since I really don't think my avg rank is going to get much higher (stupid CIA Rave...)

I'll keep track of them all in a .RTF, but do I have to post a screenshot for everyone point I achieve so that there is proof?

EDIT: Well, my hand is failing today, so this is all I'm gonna do for now. Hopefully tomorrow I'll be able to move better.

I wrote the score on the side in case anyone can't see because I unlocked a token :P
Oh, and the combo is 303. Forgot to write that.
So I now have 1 tier point. \o/

Nice unlock. I have hardcore mental blocks both regular and mirrored. =.= I'll never get the 4 point req. And you can, but it's not required.

What you should do is get a subscription. It enables you to keep track of your max combo and # of perfects, goods, averages, misses, and boos. TP calculation becomes quick and easy.

Originally Posted by Dronak

Right. I gave an example much like Zageron's in a previous post, and Bynary Fission's edit to the first post says the same basic thing. You can only get one point amount per song -- achieving a 4 point requirement gets you 4 points, not 10 (4+3+2+1). Is this the part that's confusing you, or is it something else?

On another note, I think some descriptive text was left behind when the honorable mention section was removed. It looks like a sentence or few talking about this part needs to be deleted. Just a thought about honorable mentions: what about using them for people who may end up falling off the top 30 list instead of people who never made it onto the list? If the reason for removing it was that some people were getting recognized without working to get on the top 30 list, perhaps it's OK to recognize people who were on the top 30 list but have gotten knocked out? I suppose we couldn't do that for everyone, or we'd basically have a top X list where X>30. But perhaps some people could be listed if they drop off the top 30 list.

I don't see the logic in letting people who are unable to maintain a spot on the list stay on anyways. The list is supposed to comprise of the best, not the losers who can't stay on.


~Bynary Fission