Nocilol

[devonin]

Originally Posted by GuidoHunter

shox, again, what about the people who use loli as a legal outlet for wanting to get their rocks off to kids? Were that illegal, too, what's to stop them from going straight to the CP source?

A watery argument, sure, but just as strong as your slippery slope, if you ask me.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

So as long as the people who are sexually aroused by little kids only look at fake drawings of little kids its okay, because if we made it illegal they -might- therefore be tempted to go after real little kids?

I mean, it's one thing to point out that you can't punish someone for a crime they -might- commit in the future, but its another to be functionally encouraging them to foster this sexual interest in little kids, but only think that's bad if they later on decide to act on it.

Nobody in Canada has even been convicted on child porn charges for -just- lolicon style imagery, but the -vast- majority of people convicted of possession of child porn have -both- not -just- real kids.

A connection between the two is there, and causal (Though I know someone is going to try and raise the usual and silly objection anyway)