Snapple if those are your best picks then you have no idea what true techno is. I'm sorry if that sounds elitist but it's true. Darude is fine for DDR, but is nothing compared to the likes of Venetian Snares, The Flashbulb, Aphex Twin, Emotional Joystick, etc.
Xander, you want good gabber you try DJ Sharpnel. His Gabber is always sexy.
Snapple if those are your best picks then you have no idea what true techno is. I'm sorry if that sounds elitist but it's true. Darude is fine for DDR, but is nothing compared to the likes of Venetian Snares, The Flashbulb, Aphex Twin, Emotional Joystick, etc.
Xander, you want good gabber you try DJ Sharpnel. His Gabber is always sexy.
Paul Oakenfield is just.....bleh.
Yeah well im entitled to my opinion,Ive heard the other Techno artists and I think their junk, most people Ive talked to enjoy Sandstorm and Ive never heard anyone diss the MK theme.
Be aware that using Streamripper results in craptastic sounding MP3s, because you're saving them from <128 kbps streams. Radio bitrates are fine on the radio, but they're a joke if you're actually collecting songs.
Anything higher than 128 kbps is a waste of space on my harddrive. To me there's hardly any difference with a song that has higher bitrates. Now if I had a harddrive that could store a lot, yes I wouldn't mind that extra space, but I'm running on a 70 GB harddrive here and I'm not the only one in my family who uses this computer.
128 kbps is perfect IMO. 96 kbps is fine, too, there's pretty much no difference.
Yeah, all the mp3s on my computer at 64 kbps...but that's because I am deaf and it doesnt really matter since I cant hear the music...all that matters is that people on Last.fm know that I listen to a lot of Animal Collective thus making me very hip.
Hospital Records – the world famous independent drum & bass record label. Shop exclusive vinyl, CDs, clothing & merch including T-shirts, hoodies & caps. Discover the best in DnB music.
Cyantific, Syncopix, London Elektricity, etc.
It's all basically Drum n Bass without the OMG DEATH KILLING THINGS GRR I'M ANGRY MY SONG SOUNDS LIKE A PLANE CRASHING INTO A DEAD TREE IN GOTHAM CITY RAAAARGH
Anything higher than 128 kbps is a waste of space on my harddrive. To me there's hardly any difference with a song that has higher bitrates. Now if I had a harddrive that could store a lot, yes I wouldn't mind that extra space, but I'm running on a 70 GB harddrive here and I'm not the only one in my family who uses this computer.
128 kbps is perfect IMO. 96 kbps is fine, too, there's pretty much no difference.
Hi, I used to have nothing except a 40 gig harddrive. I still downloaded everything at the highest quality I could find.
Also, 128 kbps is the lowest possible quality that you can actually listen to. Anything below it sounds like random noise. Also, even finding a bunch of junk at 128 kbps is impossible anyway, because pretty much all releases done by an actual group and not some random dude in his basement nowadays are 320, vbr, or lossless. I don't know how you would even get an entire collection of mp3s at that low of quality, unless you use Kazaa* or some ****.
I get all of my music from BitTorrent or Soulseek, so yeah. Absolutely no idea where you're finding this low-quality crap.
Oh, and disc space is negligible when dealing with mp3s anyway. A 320 mp3 might be like... 2 megs bigger than a 128 one for a short song. The longer the song is, the bigger the filesize, obviously, but that's where VBR comes in.
Comment