Take a look at those top ten players threads in the brag board from way back... 03 - 04 was basically all about stepmania here anyway and that's what all the top players bragged about. nima, reach were the top two sm (and ffr?) and jimerax of course was the number one ranked ffr player.
reach and nima were at the top of the FFR class list. especially Nima... under both Nima and SMGod.
Ridder was another good addition... he was right up there in time played for the first few years, and right up at the top in skill. I still say refer to my list. I'm sure I missed a few, but Nima, Baha, jx, Linus, Banditcom... even Robby and Alain... all were the class of the site. Recall who won the 1st FFR League, Expert Division... linus.
I believe that after the three judges from one era nominate someone, the judges from previous eras have to approve that nomination. We really don't need more than three judges per era if you look at the whole process, so I think three judges per era is fine.
honestly the era thing seems kind of silly... why not just nominate people for the hof and have a panel that votes on them? (like devonin (?) was saying earlier). different categories for players and simartists and whatnot makes sense of course.
So, the overall consensus is that the "actual list" should not be separated in eras?
Judging will still remain the same, considering each person we nominate and accept we'll be weighing down their accomplishments with the others of their era.
Anyway, we'll have a complete list, and just a list, for players. The rest of the categories will still work the same.
EDIT: The only reason why I was leaving everything into eras was because it would make more sense for organization.
If we're going to adding artists, simfiles, SiU, mods, admins, DAoTY, etc, would you rather have everything thrown on one list together, with the years in parenthesis? Or rather have it go by year, followed by everything we're going to be placing in the HoF under each year?
I want this to be agree'd upon, rather than having mixed opinions.
I really think the era idea is necessary. The game and site are completely different now from when I first joined, and I haven't been here that long. Comparing the game from back then to now isn't possible. Just look at the AIM Anthem thread when it was first released, what was an insane score back then probably wouldn't even be top 300 today.
If we are to go along with eras idea, imo it should be organized as follows:
////////////
Hall of Fame Introduction
~-~-~-~
~-~-~-~
~-~-~-~
Era 1: (date - date) Era 2: (date - date) Era 3: (date - date)
etc.
Era 1
Inductee Name
Profile/Background Info
Era 1 accomplishments Era 2 accomplishments (if applicable) Era 3 accomplishments (if applicable)
Misc. accomplishments (if applicable)
Era 2
Inductee Name
Profile/Background Info
Era 1 accomplishments (if applicable) Era 2 accomplishments Era 3 accomplishments (if applicable)
Misc. accomplishments (if applicable)
Era 3
Inductee Name
Profile/Background Info
Era 1 accomplishments (if applicable) Era 2 accomplishments (if applicable) Era 3 accomplishments
Misc. accomplishments (if applicable)
~-~-~-~
~-~-~-~
~-~-~-~
Hall of Fame Conclusion (if needed)
////////////
Something like that (with stuff added in and taken out as necessary, of course)...: /
As you can see, the inductees would be put into the era to which they most belong. Any accomplishments from other eras would simply be listed in addition to those already included.
okay? i guess?
I was thinking I'd just be a top simfile contributor during 07-ish. I was pretty much at the start of Tass's new review scheme, in fact {Rose} was in the first batch. I guess that makes me inportant in the "new era" but revolutionized everything?
I'd say Shash or even Tass himself did that more than I did...
Comment