are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answers.

[robertsona]

Go to Google.com and then go to advanced search and then under "Need more tools?" is something that says reading level; choose "annotate results with reading levels". Then search shit like this (please don't feel creeped out if I used your name, it just means I love you homosexually [no homo]):






(Under this username because Reincarnate's stats are even less impressive. Step it up, dude.)


Those of you who are in the 1% "Advanced" category, the FFR Mensa Society of Smart People (a.k.a. the FFRMSSP) will send out an e-mail, pronto. You might want to add "/vbz" to the end of the url to make it forum-only (you pedantic ****.) You can also click each of the three reading levels to see examples. Also, I have no idea how this shit is measured or if I'm even doing it right (in fact I'm like 99% positive this process doesn't actually measure the "reading level" of an individual user's posts) but shut your fat face.

Post your results!

[iironiic]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

Lol.

[leonid]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

Hey I'm in the 1% adv category

[xXAll-ProXx]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

Same as Wilson! :P

[MarioNintendo]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe



... I find these results very inaccurate.

This post is considered as basic, whereas this one counted as intermediate. If you click on the blue categories, you'll see which posts were selected.

In short, your 1% advanced probably is a lie, leonid. ;_;

[robertsona]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

you're mad cuz i'm stylin on you with my 19 percent intermediate oh yeah

[MarioNintendo]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

you're mad cuz i'm stylin on you with my 19 percent intermediate oh yeah

No. :P I'm mad because your test doesn't work properly!

[justaguy]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

nj ****in fagets



Joe Hall Wins Bitchs.

[bmah]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe



You can see which search pages were considered "basic", "intermediate", or "advanced" by clicking on those words, and the search will filter to those results. That being said, I have no clue what parameters are measured...

[Crashfan3]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

Well, that went better than expected.

[A2P]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

93/7/0

dumazshit

[robertsona]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

oh my god hayden

[Velocity]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe

My results include every post that mentions my engine, so it's not likely to be correct. :/

[I like it]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe


It changed when I didn't capitalize I.

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: are your ffr posts sufficiently erudite and/or eloquent? google has got the answe



AAA'd