Nope. But I am glad I came up with that strategy. I'll have to make a variation of it if I ever become one. I am unsure, but the new evidence about this has me wavering to Qreepy. I'm sure everyone who voted for him has the same evidence. After all, I don't trust any of you worth one of Qreepy's piles of horse dung. Why would I just simply bandwagon when I can start a bandwagon of my own (see my first post here)?
So, as far as I'm concerned,Qreepy is the wolf we need to worry about. If Tass ends up being a wolf, he'd be wise not to kill a reg from CT this round. That'd give him away.
Q
Q
^
|
|
double sig for double goodness. Sorry about that, you OCD people.
Q was just changing his vote to anything that wouldn't get him killed early on. Hopefully he will switch his vote to Tass unless he got that "undoubtable super-secret proof" that I haven't seen yet.
I'm on AIM. My SN is InsanelyCoolness (childish, I know but don't judge me for it :P)
roopert... maybe if you had your AIM available to us, you might learn this information. since almost everyone is talking about it over AIM, and not here.
@Roopert: You have to learn to trust that some people are human eventually. I agree that it may be a bit too early now, though.
That said, I don't have this "new information", so I'm not changing my vote. The way I see it, my suspicions are the best thing I have to go on, since the wolves haven't killed anyone meaningful yet.
Comment