TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • storn42
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by roundbox
    Friendly Neighbour (1-shot only, alternate of Innocent Child): At night, select a target. In the morning, they will receive the following report:
    Code:
    [User] is a [b]Friendly Neighbour[/b]. Howdy!
    ..

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by storn42
    according to the setup friendly neighbor is a 1-shot inno child that can only be sent to one person.
    ...So when do you...One shot as an innocent child? I'm very perplexed here...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hateandhatred
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Shadow_God_10
    I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?
    For the purpose of my strat, there isn't

    also I'm a dumbass, somehow I forgot not everyone would be a power role oops. That means getting an inno child AND a doctor has incredibly low odds

    Nvm the strat is trash

    Leave a comment:


  • storn42
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Shadow_God_10
    I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?
    according to the setup friendly neighbor is a 1-shot inno child that can only be sent to one person.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    There's ALSO the issue that you're bringing up PRs this early into the game that I find slightly concerning

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Hateandhatred
    Why not? The less people we are, the more appealing it would be for a wolf to claim it and if they are right, we basically lose the game.
    There runs the issue with you having the doctor save the child....In a PERFECT WORLD, this would buy us an extra 48 hours. But the wolves could very well just kill someone outside of the innocent child and kill the innocent child the night after, thus wasting a valuable resource for town

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Hateandhatred
    Sidenote, everyone... When do you guys think we should ask for inno child/friendly neighbour claims? Could help narrowing down the setup, and if someone claims, there's a 1/2 chance we have a doctor to protect it. Of course someone could bluff, but I think it could be advantageous to consider it
    I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hateandhatred
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by star-crossed
    Putting together some thoughts.

    I quite like Lewdy so far, and the fact that I do is helping give me some confidence that we can get somewhere with process of elimination today.

    I do not have a strong opinion on raeko so far. She is coming across as more positive/invested than a lot of other d0s, which to some extent makes it harder to do a 1-1 comparison. I probably like her more than people she has implied being sus of. There's a casualness to the leads she's pursuing, that comes across as less likely she already has the answers?

    I am voting bugkid right now. bugkid has been openly kind of self-conscious about showing up late. You could argue that this is good or bad. I feel better calling the (potential) bluff at this juncture. There is a timidness to their posts that could indicate being a nervous first time wolf. (Note-they have kind of interrupted this post of mine to show more spirit. I will consider if they deserve my re-evaluation.)

    The most town-minded thing storn has said is when he stated he feels he is making content. In my mind, he is mostly saying pseudo philosophical things and giving nonsensical and vaguely contradictory reasons for voting Hateandhatred.

    Hateandhatred - Right now I have him as slightly town for the post where he said he is not defending himself, and the one where he responded to T-Force about the Haku questioning. Both these sound genuine in a way that I think they may not if he was a wolf.

    I am also pretty neutral so far on FreezinIce, T-Force, Haku. It remains to be seen if Freezin puts his money where his mouth is with trying to be spicy. For instance, I think that saying you are voting somebody to be spicy actually makes it less spicy. I hope we end up in the thread at the same time. It may help me know if you are mild at heart.
    Man after that trash tier bugkid incident this is great. I do not share everything in this though, but I also don't feel like I can refute any of this. Very sound, but not super intuitive to me yet. You did gud!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hateandhatred
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by mellon_collie
    definitely not now lmao
    Why not? The less people we are, the more appealing it would be for a wolf to claim it and if they are right, we basically lose the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • star-crossed
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Putting together some thoughts.

    I quite like Lewdy so far, and the fact that I do is helping give me some confidence that we can get somewhere with process of elimination today.

    I do not have a strong opinion on raeko so far. She is coming across as more positive/invested than a lot of other d0s, which to some extent makes it harder to do a 1-1 comparison. I probably like her more than people she has implied being sus of. There's a casualness to the leads she's pursuing, that comes across as less likely she already has the answers?

    I am voting bugkid right now. bugkid has been openly kind of self-conscious about showing up late. You could argue that this is good or bad. I feel better calling the (potential) bluff at this juncture. There is a timidness to their posts that could indicate being a nervous first time wolf. (Note-they have kind of interrupted this post of mine to show more spirit. I will consider if they deserve my re-evaluation.)

    The most town-minded thing storn has said is when he stated he feels he is making content. In my mind, he is mostly saying pseudo philosophical things and giving nonsensical and vaguely contradictory reasons for voting Hateandhatred.

    Hateandhatred - Right now I have him as slightly town for the post where he said he is not defending himself, and the one where he responded to T-Force about the Haku questioning. Both these sound genuine in a way that I think they may not if he was a wolf.

    I am also pretty neutral so far on FreezinIce, T-Force, Haku. It remains to be seen if Freezin puts his money where his mouth is with trying to be spicy. For instance, I think that saying you are voting somebody to be spicy actually makes it less spicy. I hope we end up in the thread at the same time. It may help me know if you are mild at heart.

    Leave a comment:


  • mellon_collie
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Hateandhatred
    Sidenote, everyone... When do you guys think we should ask for inno child/friendly neighbour claims? Could help narrowing down the setup, and if someone claims, there's a 1/2 chance we have a doctor to protect it. Of course someone could bluff, but I think it could be advantageous to consider it
    definitely not now lmao

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by Shadow_God_10
    Hear me out for a second....What if we just opened in because chaos?
    Today on Lewdy can't fucking spell: *IT....not IN.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hateandhatred
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by bugkid666
    that's a good point tbh. i felt bad for missing the first essentially two days of thread and wanted to contribute something, even if ultimately useless atm

    what else can we go off right now but vibes? that's my vibe list. most of them are "I don't know" but that's realistic for me all throughout the game. i get called out for it a lot and i don't care. i'd rather contribute my smallest thoughts now so that i don't regret not saying something later.

    the biggest point i think i want to make even if i do get voted here is that a few people have been quick to say "haku definitely town" based on their posts and i think that's a mistake. if anything that gives me EVEN MORE reason to not let them slip by unnoticed. i'm not saying their posts look bad, i just want to encourage everyone to not narrow in on an alignment for anyone yet, especially after one post.
    I'll trust the others' judgement if you're just known to play like this, but you're already on the defensive and to me that's extremely sus.

    The argument about Haku (to me) is that it's weird he would immediately put himself in the spotlight like this and I feel like a scum Haku wouldn't play this way right off the bat, but I don't think he is locked town for anyone. You do however sound like you say this because the logic applies to yourself, as you coming in and dropping a bunch of "feels" (they're not that) like this definitely looks terrible and you know it.

    But, again, maybe it is legit your way of trying to make a worthy contribution when there is essentially zero information available.

    Sidenote, everyone... When do you guys think we should ask for inno child/friendly neighbour claims? Could help narrowing down the setup, and if someone claims, there's a 1/2 chance we have a doctor to protect it. Of course someone could bluff, but I think it could be advantageous to consider it

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by mellon_collie
    if you do this, I will too, you will set off a chain of events to start the real actual GHOST TWG

    you don't want to open this door
    Hear me out for a second....What if we just opened in because chaos?

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadow_God_10
    replied
    Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

    Originally posted by storn42
    my guy, you really wanna drag this out? I intended to make a silly vote. I intended to use random.org to decide the wolves and I intended to follow through with a vote. RNG being RNG it happened to be the top "wagon"
    This is actually so on par for Storn that it hurts.

    Leave a comment:

Working...