Husikam Rave Dojo :: FFR Batch Submission
ositzxz369 -
Husikam Rave Dojo -
Venetian Snares [8.5 / 10]
May/June 2020
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
Simfile Folder Name
Husikam Rave Dojo (ositzxz369)
Note Count
2136
Chart Length
3:34
Average NPS
10.0961
Estimated Difficulty
80.76
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 6
3 - 14
4 - 27
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps
1 Second
25 - 25.00 nps
2 Seconds
40 - 20.00 nps
5 Seconds
87 - 17.40 nps
10 Seconds
147 - 14.70 nps
30 Seconds
380 - 12.67 nps
1 Minute
700 - 11.67 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.03s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.5s0.5s0.5s0.5s
Posted at 3:05pm on October 15th, 2020
25.852 & 26.110: Also jumps to match 25.593 & 26.628
54.214 - 56.973: Sounds in this section like 54.214 or 56.455 have lot more emphasis than surrounding singles and could use jumps to match
80.248: Switch columns with 80.766 to better fit PR
82.662: Same as 80.248
105.248: A patterning here like 214214 would better match PR due to higher drum pitch at 105.421
149.731 - 153.179: Absolutely no reason to not have anything here
-Song could end at 212.145 and there'd be no loss whatsoever, false endings aren't funny. Especially with how the last 2 repeats of the ending, the notes are going to sounds with incredibly faint and muddied downbeats to where it doesn't feel like you're playing to anything.
*File's fine, but the song itself has no variation and with you going the whole nearly 4 minutes it also leads to a file with pretty much no variation. I understand what you've currently got jumps going to but if you stick to just those sounds as jumps and nothing else you lose out on a lot of impact and emphasis other sounds in the song may have. You were certainly consistent with it though.
Posted at 3:03am on October 16th, 2020
See my reply below to the judge's notes
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
MP3 Length changed: 3:41 => 3:32
----------
Note Count changed: 2128 => 2124
Chart Length changed: 3:43 => 3:34
AVG NPS changed: 9.64059 => 10.03939
Hand Bias changed: 14 => -2
Posted at 3:05am on October 16th, 2020
80.248 – I don’t agree with switching the 1-3 columns; it’ll mess up the PR of the next 2 arrows (81.282, 81.455). I currently have a perfect 4-note ascend pattern (80.765, 81.282, 81.455, 82.144). Same thing applies to 82.662.
95.593-95.938 – In this section, it was originally [23]4123412, which I didn’t like b/c it started a roll on a [23]; so now I changed it to [13]4213421 to express the “weak descend, ascend, strong descend” of the entire roll wall of 95.593-96.627. Can u tell me if this is a change for the better?
149.731-153.179 – Now this, I have a good reason. Throughout the file, most of the male vocals had the beat as its base. Any noise from the beat gets an arrow, and if there’s male vocals on top of that noise, I color it white. In this section, there’s no noise from the beat, therefore no arrows to color white. There are a few times when I had a white note on some spots as a way to simplify buzz noises.
I followed the rest of ur suggestions.
Posted at 5:56pm on October 18th, 2020
80.248: From comment about switching columns, I don't mean just swap the two notes and leave it as that. Just that 80.248 is obviously lower than 80.766 and this spot right here would be as good a spot as any in the file to follow PR. Just because adjusting these two notes would mess with 81.283 and 81.455 PR slightly doesn't mean you should ignore these initial two notes that are blatantly worse off than the other two that you're worried about, can always adjust slightly around it . 1323 still fits PR better than current pattern anyway, or even a 1324 which still fits idea of ascending pitches better than current pattern while not mushing with your 1231234 pattern just after. And then obviously all of this again for 82.662.
95.593: Original pattern is better due to (23) being a better jump to start roll with than (13). Current roll pattern is also fine as the directions fit slight pitch differences in the higher-pitched sound going on.
149.731: Just because a layering choice is followed all the way through doesn't mean it can't be adjusted slightly for small sections where it'd be warranted, which case for this section, it's definitely warranted. The few times you had single whites for buzz noises in other parts of the file (nothing wrong with btw) doesn't mean you can't also have singles here of whatever color to the very distinct and prominent vocal sounds instead of just ignoring it and having nothing for 4 seconds. Layering can be fluid, there can be slight adjustments while still keeping consistency, not everything is black and white.
Posted at 1:06am on October 27th, 2020
2nd update!
Timestamps are now slightly off after cutting off the false ending, but the general spot of things is pretty much the same.
80.248 – Ok, I’ll do 1323 PR (same for 82.662).
95.593 – Recheck this pattern to see if it’s still good. I now accounted for 3 pitch changes in the roll wall (instead of the incorrect/former/original number of 2 pitch changes).
149.731 – Ok, I stepped the rest of the vocals.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2124 => 2136
AVG NPS changed: 10.03939 => 10.09611
Hand Bias changed: -2 => 2