Permission good (blanket)
Sync good
Metadata good

- 22.775-23.840: ow
- 25.616-25.971: are the 16ths due to the fade-in?
- 30.409: why minijack?
- 32.361: doesn't sound much stronger than previous jumps
- 38.397, 44.077: either both jumps or both hands
- 39.107: maybe reduce the OHT

**[FR] 49.758-1:00.231: this section is somewhat spiky due to various factors:
--- hand imbalance: many minijacks are placed on the left hand side
--- 52.509: this minijack is especially hard to hit due to 51.710-52.420 having a lot going on already; I would reduce it to 2[134] or [12][34], but there may be other ways to get around it
--- 58.456-59.166: the 32nds placement makes one-hand control tricky; placing each on a different column from the preceding 16th (like 0:22 and 1:57) could work

- 1:03.130: jump
- 1:06.267: missing
- 1:14.432-1:14.610: 23 for PR
- 1:19.314-1:20.113: OHT could be reduced by tweaking 1:19.935-
- 1:21.710-1:22.065: two 48th or 64th rolls

- 1:27.746: jump
- 1:36.267, 1:41.947: hand?
- 1:47.095: minijacks (they wouldn't make it too difficult)

Fun chart overall. Although most of the difficulty is contained in just a few sections, I think it's an acceptable degree and those sections are pretty interesting too. The **'d section feels a bit spiky though; while mirror does help, I think the last two 32nds should be smoothed out at least.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Fixes Required

Thanks for notes!!

- 22.775-23.840: ow //Rearranged
- 25.616-25.971: are the 16ths due to the fade-in? //Removed
- 30.409: why minijack? //Reasons that were bad
- 32.361: doesn't sound much stronger than previous jumps //Rejected; has the same orchestral hit as eg. 27.036
- 38.397, 44.077: either both jumps or both hands //Relayered
- 39.107: maybe reduce the OHT //Reduced

**[FR] 49.758-1:00.231: this section is somewhat spiky due to various factors:
--- hand imbalance: many minijacks are placed on the left hand side //Rearranged some
--- 52.509: this minijack is especially hard to hit due to 51.710-52.420 having a lot going on already; I would reduce it to 2[134] or [12][34], but there may be other ways to get around it //Reduced
--- 58.456-59.166: the 32nds placement makes one-hand control tricky; placing each on a different column from the preceding 16th (like 0:22 and 1:57) could work //Rearranged

- 1:03.130: jump //Relayered
- 1:06.267: missing //Replaced..? Might be a typo? I don't hear anything on .267 but did add a missing note on .207
- 1:14.432-1:14.610: 23 for PR //Rearranged
- 1:19.314-1:20.113: OHT could be reduced by tweaking 1:19.935- //Rearranged, OHT is shorter
- 1:21.710-1:22.065: two 48th or 64th rolls //Redone, did 48ths, seem to work better

- 1:27.746: jump //Relayered
- 1:36.267, 1:41.947: hand? //Relayered
- 1:47.095: minijacks (they wouldn't make it too difficult) //Relayered

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Hand Bias changed: -2 => 0

Accepted -- 58.190-59.698 is heavy on the left hand (especially column 1), but the preceding pattern seems to balance it out a bit.