Robotron 2000 :: FFR Batch Submission
Xtreme2252 - Robotron 2000 - Freezepop [6 / 10]
17th Official Tournament
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Freezepop blanket

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Robotron 2000 [Xtreme2252]" vs "Robotron 2000 (Xtreme2252)"

- The sim folder contains additional files that can be removed. [ .ssc ]

Simfile Folder Name

Robotron 2000 [Xtreme2252]

Note Count

1424

Chart Length

3:08

Average NPS

7.7701

Estimated Difficulty

52.72

First Note

0:05

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 10

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 44

Jumps

x 404

Hands

x 0

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 1

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
9 - 18.00 nps 1 Second
14 - 14.00 nps 2 Seconds
23 - 11.50 nps 5 Seconds
53 - 10.60 nps 10 Seconds
104 - 10.40 nps 30 Seconds
284 - 9.47 nps 1 Minute
481 - 8.02 nps

Color Count

x 800 (56.18%)
x 471 (33.08%)
x 41 (2.88%)
x 13 (0.91%)
x 7 (0.49%)
x 12 (0.84%)
x 10 (0.7%)
x 14 (0.98%)
x 56 (3.93%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.27s1.07s1.03s0.97s0.97s0.93s0.9s0.87s
35
28
21
14
7

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1387 => 1424
AVG NPS changed: 7.56821 => 7.7701
Hand Bias changed: 5 => 10

Robotron 2000 (Xtreme2252) [6.5/10]
>Perms & sync good
>Put your name in the metadata. Also remove the .ssc file from your folder, and use Parentheses (not square brackets) in the author name of your folder

8.218-17.690 - What are the jumps going to? If it's to the snares/kicks, then you need to recheck this
33.163 - Should be [2] b/c lower pitch
39.004/44.056 - Should be jump. Whistle noise. Compare 39.320/39.636
42.478 - Why jump? No whistle noise. Compare 41.846/42.162
54.792 - Make this somehow fit into the [4] lane to keep the consistency of using the same "3 jump-single" pattern. Compare 48.951-49.740/51.477-52.266
55.029 - If you're stepping this hi-hat, then you need to recheck the whole file for that
1:12.633-1:13.580 - Why jumps on the 8ths?
1:27.468 - Should be [1] for better PR
1:59.523 - Should not be part of a minijack. Compare 1:51.787-1:52.892
2:01.260-2:01.733 - Should be part of a minijack. 1:53.050-1:54.155
2:03.141 - Sounds closer to 2:03.075
2:03.634 - Sounds closer to 2:03.726
2:06.943 - Should be single. No vocal
2:11.811 - Sounds closer to 2:11.877
2:13.120-2:16.738 - Why no jumps on some of the robot vocals? Compare 1:05.956-1:12.113
2:14.179 - Sounds closer to 2:14.101
2:14.337 - Missing note
2:17.048-2:26.520 - Why are there jumps on the kick now? On a section like this, it was only on the ChiptuneMelody & the Gong noise. Compare 1:12.633-1:22.105
2:38.519-2:39.624/2:41.045-2:42.150/2:43.571-2:44.677 - Do the minijack thingy
2:58.728-3:05.359 - Currently offsync & needs PR. Please put in the effort to stepping this

>>Some of my notes here are from my previous review of this file, and some are new. While this is better than the previous version, it still needs more cleanup. As always, keep up the consistency

Judge Score: 6.50 - Rejected

Robotron 2000 (Xtreme2252)

- Offset's mostly fine for the most part, but the vocals seem to drift ever so slightly, from the original sync. Not sure if it's because of the audio or the quantizations itself, so please make sure to tighten those up.
*- .ssc is found inside the folder, make sure to remove that too.

The first 45 seconds seems to be missing jumps to the percussion and melody here, since you sort of mixed them up altogether, so there's no clear indication if the layering was the purpose of this inconsistency. Even if that's the case, the choice on how you layer them feels sloppy and arbitrary - 20.910 for example doesn't have the jump where the repetitive motif clearly does exist and you didn't utilize them.

PR in general as a whole can be improved a lot here - there's about little to zero usage in PR to utilize in that department (namely 1:15.159 and other similar instances, even in the intro)

1:34.104 - Some of the repetitive nature in the sounds are pretty hard to justify these left column trills, where most of it is atonal (you don't have to constrain yourself into making these patterning choices, you have the creative liberty to move things around especially when these sounds are mostly atonal).

The second half mostly has those similar issues, it's tough to pick up every single one of them so I'll end the notes here. Layering as a whole is very confusing, even though I like some of the patterning (for example 47.372, where you utilize the minijacks quite sparingly and make up for an interesting motif). The song itself is pretty hard to make an engaging chart out of, and partly I don't blame you for that lack of variety in it. This needs a fair bit of work to modernize the structural foundation in this chart. [5.5/10]

Judge Score: 5.50 - Rejected