35
28
21
14
7
LINK[INIT] :: FFR Batch Submission
jh05013 -
LINK[INIT] -
BilliumMoto [7.75 / 10]
OT17 Bounty Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/batch_submission/batch/?id=1689
Conditional permission to notify the author, which was previously done by YoshL.
Originally submitted to the other batch but was told that it's low 90s. Similar difficulty to YoshL's submission, but should be fairly different in patterning assuming that was the same one from their pack.
Originally submitted to the other batch but was told that it's low 90s. Similar difficulty to YoshL's submission, but should be fairly different in patterning assuming that was the same one from their pack.
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
LINK[INIT] (jh05013)Note Count
1760Chart Length
2:10Average NPS
13.8911Estimated Difficulty
90.17
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 22
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 23 3 - 76 4 - 121Jumps
x 380
Hands
x 36
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 9
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
40 - 20.00 nps 5 Seconds
87 - 17.40 nps 10 Seconds
165 - 16.50 nps 30 Seconds
453 - 15.10 nps 1 Minute
857 - 14.28 nps
Color Count
x 572 (32.5%)
x 484 (27.5%)
x 47 (2.67%)
x 388 (22.05%)
x 46 (2.61%)
x 124 (7.05%)
x 44 (2.5%)
x 30 (1.7%)
x 25 (1.42%)
Posted at 6:18pm on April 27th, 2024
Approved for low-90s bounty
Posted at 3:40am on May 7th, 2024
LINK[INIT] (jh05013) [7.5/10]
>Perms & sync good
>Have your acc name visible in the metadata
2.196/7.256/10.419/13.762 - Why jump?
8.341/13.583/14.666/15.931/16.202/17.558 - Why single?
9.877-10.058 - Why jack?
11.774 - Technically diff pitch than 11.594
26.995 - Diff noise. Shouldn't be part of the jack
31.473-31.744 - Technically 48ths (or nerfed to 24ths)
31.744-31.790 - Technically 64ths (or nerfed to 32nds)
35.449-35.991 - Why no jumps on this spot, but 38.341-38.793 gets jumps?
38.341 - Should be diff jump pattern than 38.702-37.793
39.877 - Should be minijack?
42.588 - Why is this a jump, but not 42.678?
51.285-51.511 - Sounds more like 3443
57.317 - Total bait with that hand, given that the previous hands were percussive. Sounds more like a roll/burst
1:00.028-1:00.208 - Why stepped different? Compare 48.461-48.642/54.244-54.425
1:03.913 - Ghost note
1:05.449 - Why jump? Compare 48.100/53.883/59.666
1:05.811-1:05.991 - See comment on 1:00.028-1:00.208
1:07.256 - Should be single. Compare 1:04.365
1:09.064 - Would make this burst smoother if this was on [1]
1:17.287 - This shouldn't be [34], since the other [34]'s (1:17.558/1:17.738) have claps
1:30.931 - This section would still make sense if this was moved to [3]. Melody is ascending anyways
1:43.401-1:43.898 - Why not roll wall?
1:46.880 - Should be [3] to differentiate from 1:46.473's pitch
1:53.341 - Should be jump and make a minijack w/ 1:53.341. Compare 1:53.883-1:53.973
1:53.612 - Should be jump. Whether it makes a minijack w/ 1:53.702 (a non-percussion noise) depends on you
2:02.015-2:02.106/2:03.461 - Should be jump. Compare 1:50.449-1:50.630
>>Mostly straightforward & consistent. Layering can be better
Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended
Posted at 4:27pm on May 18th, 2024
LINK[INIT] (jh05013) [8/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
2.196 - may not want a jump yet. Or add 0.750
11.594 - 22.437 - I'm not sure what layering structure you're going for here. These suggestions are my best guess - choose which to address as necessary.
-13.582 - why not jump?
-15.028 - why jump?
-16.112 / .202 - One of these should maybe be a jump
-20.088 - why not jump?
46.654 / 49.546 / 50.991 / 51.714 / (subjective)1:02.558 - snap jumps?
48.642 - (somewhat subjective) add 24ths to .823
52.618 - not jump - compare 46.835 / 49.726
57.317 - suggest smaller chord size here to give .497 more emphasis
1:10.871 - Piano flam?
1:45.630 / 1:48.521 - missing?
The last half of this chart is damn solid, impressive work. First half could do with layering consistency checks - that's what my notes amount to. Great chart overall!~
Judge Score: 8.00 - Accepted
Posted at 6:23am on June 1st, 2024
Thanks for the notes.
- 2.196, 13.762 are voice + melody
- 9.877-10.058 is the same jack as 6.985-7.166
-** 11.594-20.268: I charted this section 2 years ago and I don't like it anymore, so I recharted it from scratch, with jumps at percussions and some right hand anchors to represent repeating ambient sounds
- 31.473-31.835: similarly to how we often approximate 32nds with 24ths, I'm approximating 48ths with 32nds here; I'm not hearing 64ths in the last part
- 42.678: out of space
- 1:43.401-1:43.898: just thought it would be boring lol
- 1:45.630, 1:48.521: the main instrument is not there
- 1:53.341, 1:53.612 are weaker than 1:53.883. changed 1:50.449, etc. to single instead
- The rest of the notes were applied (possibly except the ones I decided not to apply but forgot to mention)
Posted at 6:24am on June 1st, 2024
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1771 => 1760
AVG NPS changed: 13.9779 => 13.89108
Hand Bias changed: 15 => 22