Hospitality :: FFR Batch Submission
ositzxz369 -
Hospitality -
Venetian Snares [7.5 / 10]
OT17 Bounty Batch
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
Simfile Folder Name
Hospitality (ositzxz369)
Note Count
3333
Chart Length
3:50
Average NPS
14.6936
Estimated Difficulty
98.47
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 121
3 - 141
4 - 72
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps
1 Second
24 - 24.00 nps
2 Seconds
44 - 22.00 nps
5 Seconds
102 - 20.40 nps
10 Seconds
191 - 19.10 nps
30 Seconds
514 - 17.13 nps
1 Minute
976 - 16.27 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
0.7s0.6s0.57s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s
Posted at 6:18pm on April 27th, 2024
Approved for high-90s/low 100s bounty
Posted at 10:23pm on June 18th, 2024
Hospitality (ositzxz369) [7.5/10] -FR-
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
12.304: This is pretty spiky relative to the rest of the song for what it goes to. Consider repatterning it without the minitrill.
49.247: Moving this to col 3 would be ok PR wise and really make this a lot less awkward on the left hand.
1:01.076: Could afford a triplet (13) jack here to contrast with 1:02.276.
2:07.247: This is rough on the left hand for a fade in.
2:41.361-2:44.961 [FR]: Damn, the left hand bias here is intense for no apparent reason. The PR is understandable, but there's no reason to make this so biased towards one hand.
3:22.504 [FR]: Yeah no, the vocals aren't 8ths here (they're faster), they're only 8ths starting from 3:26.961. Either sync them properly or simply chart the white notes starting at 3:26.961. The same problem, although less apparent, happens at 2:53.704 (where the "hello" is also not charted the same way).
This is a fun chart and it really does not feel like it's as lengthy as it is. The jacks are fine and actually quite welcome given that they make the 16ths less generic and they also represent the song well enough. Fix the vocals white notes and the left hand biased section and this should be good to go. The 32nds in the first quarter are a bit rough given that the rest is mostly 16ths, but it's not unjustified either so that's fine as is.
Judge Score: 7.50 - Fixes Required
Posted at 11:36am on September 24th, 2024
Permission good (🆚)
Sync: -0.215 works best for me, but I realized it after writing most of the notes, so the notes below are given under the original sync (-0.219).
Metadata good
Those white notes are hard to sync, but here are my best guesses (I timed them in my -0.215 offset and shifted them back to -0.219):
- 40.497 -> 40.583 (and then step 40.504 again)
- 46.493 -> 46.579 (and then step 46.500 again)
- 1:40.754 -> 1:40.797
- 1:41.611 -> 1:41.626
- 1:41.868 -> 1:41.840
- 1:42.383 -> 1:42.397
- 1:42.983-1:43.761 -> 1:42.954(jump) 1:43.068 1:43.176 1:43.297 1:43.404 1:43.511 1:43.626
- 2:53.697, 2:53.869 -> 2:53.754, 2:53.840
- 3:40.240 -> 3:40.297 (some "hello"es are slower than others)
- 3:41.183 -> 3:41.226
- 3:41.697 -> 3:41.740
- 3:42.640 -> 3:42.697
- 3:43.154-3:46.157 -> 3:43.197 3:43.411 3:44.226 3:44.690 3:44.869 3:45.083 3:45.683 3:45.897 3:46.040
The rest of the chart:
- 3.647, 3.990, 6.047, 6.390, etc.: could be jumps
- 4.419, 14.018: ghosts (there is a sound at 4.461, but that's hard to hear at 100% speed either)
- 6.819, 16.419, 17.961: not minijacks
* 32.447-32.619 and 33.647-33.819 both have the repeating "he" sound. I'd go with removing the jack in the second one (like 12[13]) since it's a bit nasty to hit
- 33.476: could be a jump
- 49.076: jump?
* 49.590-49.761: this makes a bit spiky transition out of the jack. I tried a few alternative approaches, but I think removing the roll in 49.633-49.719 works best (1) because the density gives little room to work with, and (2) for the consistency with 49.761-50.961 which also has the 32nd sounds.
- 54.219, 57.819: jumps?
- 56.790: not minijacks
- 1:06.476: single
- 1:07.161: 4 to distinguish with 1:06.990
- 1:46.847: jump? (if added, may need to tweak 1:46.847-1:47.190 for the right hand balance)
- 1:57.647: jumpminijack? stronger than others
- 1:59.876, 1:59.961, 2:00.047: jumps
- 2:10.590: single
- 2:13.333, 2:15.733, 2:16.933: move to 2:13.354, 2:15.754, 2:16.954
- 2:16.161: [13] to differentiate with 2:16.418
- 2:21.819: strong enough to be a jump
- [2:23.961, 2:24.133], [2:25.161, 2:25.333], [2:26.361, 2:26.533], [2:27.561, 2:27.733], [2:35.961, 2:36.133], [2:37.161, 2:37.333]: seems inconsistent in jump/single
* 2:44.104, 2:48.904: [34] for easier transitions out of the jacks, though it's musically the most intense section so I guess it works either way
- 2:46.504, 2:49.418: jumps
- 2:59.961: jump (and make 3:00.047 single?)
- 3:08.704: not minijack
* 3:27.990-3:29.190: ow, that left hand's rough. Suggest reducing minijacks; I think even something as simple as 1212[12] 121212[12] is fine.
- 3:32.611: white 2 here; also tweak nearby notes so that 3:32.790 doesn't use a 2
- 3:36.219, 3:37.418: jumps
- 3:37.847: single
Taking such a chaotic song as my first judge file... was something. It's a spicy fun file though. A bit spiky in some moments marked with *s, but shouldn't be too hard to take care of them.
Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended
Posted at 5:42am on October 25th, 2024
To OP~
12.304 - Changed. Recheck 12.304-12.518
49.247 - Reworked this section. Recheck 49.247-50.961
1:01.076 - K
2:07.247 - Changed. Recheck 2:07.419-2:08.790
*2:41.361-2:44.961 - This better? Recheck 2:42.390-2:49.847
*3:22.504 - By faster, perhaps it is 7/64's (a 64th faster)? Recheck 3:22.504-3:26.961
To jh~
White Notes(etc) - K
3.647(etc) - They're not jumps b/c it's not percussion
4.419(etc) - They're not ghost b/c it's melody (4.447/14.047 is prolly better approximation of that melody note)
6.819(etc) - 6.819/16.419 are minijacks b/c it's melody. 17.961 is minijack b/c of that weird noise
*33.647-33.819 - Changed. Recheck this section
33.476 - No percussion
49.076 - Can be jump, but this snare is not as strong as 48.904's
*49.590-49.761 - Reworked this section. Recheck 49.247-50.961
54.219 - Sure. Recheck 54.047-54.390
56.790 - Sure. Recheck 56.790-56.961
57.819 - Sure. Recheck 57.819-58.161
1:06.476 - Percussion
1:07.161 - K
1:46.847 - No percussion
1:57.647 - Sure. Recheck 1:57.647-1:57.818
1:59.876(etc) - Noise too weak to be jumps
2:10.590 - Snare
2:13.333(etc) - K
2:16.161 - No need to change the jump PR here since the background melody isn't doing anything at this moment
2:21.819 - K
2:23.961(etc) - The strength of the percussion is vague in this section. At the moment, those jumps are what I considered to be strong enough
*2:44.104/2:48.904 - Reworked. Recheck 2:42.390-2:49.847
2:46.504/2:49.418 - Why jump?
2:59.961 - This is intentionally a single b/c I don't want an unnecessary jumpglut. I only do jumpgluts as a last resort if there's no better way to represent 3 diff jump sounds in a certain section. 3:00.047 is jump b/c percussion
3:08.704 - It's minijack b/c of that weird noise
*3:27.990-3:29.190 - Sure. Recheck 3:27.990-3:29.190
3:32.611 - Eh, I'll just move it to 1
3:36.219/3:37.418 - Why jump for 3:36.219? Although for 3:37.418 (and for any melody note after 3:29.361), I'll turn these to jumps
3:37.847 - Jump b/c part of melody and bass
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 3323 => 3333
AVG NPS changed: 14.64952 => 14.69361
Hand Bias changed: 67 => 61
Posted at 10:14am on October 29th, 2024
My *s and Op's FRs seem good, and I checked the rest of the notes as well.
As discussed in DM, 3:22.504- is now technically accurate, but I feel like it's susceptible to a handful of Goods, especially around the left hand's 3-jack at 3:23.876. I did find a somewhat working strategy after a bit of practice, though *I recommend nerfing the 3-jack so that players can focus on the polyrhythm.
Posted at 8:09am on November 10th, 2024
It was decided to keep the jack.