Rottel-Da-Star (Ultimate Mike7) [6/10]
>Perms & metadata good
>Bit offsync at the current -0.040 initial offset. All my notes here will be on -0.026 initial offset

1.451 - Is this supposed to go on the chipmunk vocals? If so, then this is a ghost note
6.326/6.626 - Should be single. Jump = Synth in this section, right? Compare 1.376-4.676
10.376 - Why jump?
11.726 - Should be jump. Compare 11.426
13.076-14.726 - I suggest stepping the "wa" sound as [14]'s here to avoid the unnecessary anchors, to maintain layering consistency, and to lead into 15.026
13.376/14.276 - Should be jump. Vocal
15.626-19.076 - The "wa"'s should be on the same jump pattern. Compare the two previous "wa" sections
19.976-20.088 - This roll transition would be smoother if it was either 4231's or 4132's
20.576/21.776/22.976/24.176/27.851 - Missing note
25.601/26.801 - Ghost note
26.126-29.426 - What are these jumps going to?
30.026-33.326 - No chipmunk vocal 16ths? Compare 1.226-9.326
31.076 - Should be [13]
32.276 - Should be [24]
32.876 - Should be [14]
35.726 - Should be [12]
39.176 - Why jump?
39.326-39.588 - This roll transition would be smoother if it was either 1324's or 1423's
39.926-41.276 - The "wa"'s should be same jump pattern as 39.626. Compare 10.826-11.276
42.176 - Should be jump. "Wa"
42.326/45.326 - Should be jump. Kick
42.476-47.876 - Recheck your "wa"'s
51.626-56.576 - It's so unclear whether the jumps are going to the vocals or the kick/snare. Sometimes you do it and sometimes you don't
57.026-57.476 - What is determining the PR on these jumps?
1:07.526-1:07.676 - Why minijack?
1:08.876-1:16.676 - Where are these 16ths coming from?
1:16.826 - Should be hand? Compare 1:12.026
1:24.651 - Should have 48th flam? Compare 1:19.851
1:25.826 - Should have 48th flam? Compare 1:25.251
1:27.926-1:36.926 - In this entire section, the only consistent thing you did here was stepping that screeching noise as hands
1:42.776 - Should be [34]
1:44.876 - Should be [23]
1:47.051/1:47.651/1:48.251/1:48.851/1:49.451/1:50.051/1:50.501/1:51.251 - Ghost note
1:49.751 - Missing note

>>Too many inconsistencies to list

Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected

Rottel-Da-Star (Ultimate Mike7)

*- Offset's not quite right - seems to be on the -0.026, so please change to that. Notes are based on the old offset.

0.490 - Shouldn't be a jump, it plays into another musical cue leading to the roll.
*5.815 - Left hand bias is very noticeable here, especially with that left hand trill.
7.315/8.215 etc. - Ghost note. I think in general the 16ths in this section are mostly muddy or unclear so it's hard to tell what it goes to exactly.
10.390 - Should be a single.
14.290 - Missing jump.
15.227 - Following your structure, this is missing 32nds.
19.315 - Ghost notes. Check your rhythms properly here - seems to be a pretty recurring theme in this chart.
**29.490 - Transition to this 24th is gross, forces a right-handed trill at 300bpm in that spot. This section in particular could have benefitted in a more prudent approach than just forcing this kind of transition, namely your jump shouldn't be two-handed (like [23] for example) or something along those lines.
*34.615 - Repeating the theme for 5.815 as well.
38.590 - Missing 16ths here.
38.815 - These are 12ths, not 16ths.
*39.265 - Also a pretty gross transition here, the left-handed trill into outward 32nd rolls is not very friendly.
42.190 - Missing jump.
44.027 - Same as 15.227.
53.815 - Ghost 16th.
59.440 - Ghost 4th?
59.590 - Should be a jump.

I think in general most of these granular notes do repeat throughout the entire chart - get a handle on what's missing and what should not be ghost notes as this is also a good example where your structure gets a bit on the convoluted side. It's not entirely certain where these ghost notes (mainly the 16ths for the jumpstreams or for the vocal split) are deliberately placed for flow, as sometimes even if you're placing them for flow, you still missed in a couple places.

1:07.915 - Incorrect rhythm, seems to be faster than just 16ths.
1:23.008 - Why are these flams different than, say, 1:19.540?
**1:41.590 - Why is this differently layered than 5.590?

A lot of this chart is plagued with technical errors, mostly comes down to unstable approach of your layering and sometimes delight in gross transitions. Needs significant amount of changes to make this work, as the execution is missing the mark unfortunately. [5/10]

Judge Score: 5.00 - Rejected