silly-willy-nilly (Skayles & ositzxz369) - 5/10
13.069 - burst here just doesn't feel right given that players will process this as one pattern, and yet there are 3 sounds here
16.969 - feels like this should be much heavier
19.122 - 32nd burst would start here, though to be honest i think a slower burst (28th?) would've sufficed
20.701 - sound is too shrill to ignore
21.275 & 21.347 - missing doubles
24.289/etc. - 2[12] >:(
28.069 - bursts should come in sets of 5, not 4
29.457 - this can be moved to column 2, hand bias seems unnecessary here. 29.600 can arguably be a jumptrill
33.548/33.691 - should be doubles
35.342/35.772 - these could potentially be bursts
39.678 - weird place for a burst to stop here
41.944 - not sure where the 48th burst comes from
55.150 - minor point, but i think you can afford shifting the 32nds to 48ths or 64ths to differentiate it from the other buzzes
1:04.049 - should probably be doubles?
1:05.341 - buzzes here are discrete and separate, a continuous 32nd burst is way too much here

I'll stop here because there's a bit too much for me to point out. The chart's layering is both too much and too little -- there are a lot of bursts that I can't quite tell what they're going to, and often times they feel more heavy-handed than not due to their tight patterns or high speeds to soft and short sounds (this is more pertinent in the latter half, like 1:42.xx), and there are many other parts that I felt could be layered more heavily because the sounds are so pronounced. The chart feels very gratuitous and unbalanced as a result, though there are clear signs of structure here and there. Just feels that much can be ironed out overall.

silly-willy-nilly (ositzxz369 & Skayles)

- Offset's fine.

*I think this chart could use a lot more of tinkering with the difficulty balance. The transitions felt too rigid with abrasive patterning when the song doesn't really call for it, and with the emptier sections it makes the difficulty feel more uneven than what it is. The bursts itself felt a touch too aggressive to me, and it felt offputting when paired with the anchors or rigid transitions.

18.739 - Personal preference, but this would play slightly smoother if you tone this down to a jump, maybe something like a [14] since the heavy bass kick comes later.
23.859 - Mirror this trill so it doesn't collide with a minijack please.
28.069 - This looks okay-ish, but the patterning could be handled and balanced a bit more nicely.
30.174 - [34]?
1:36.034 - Can't hear this 48th grace.
1:37.207 - For a sound that you used sharp 48th rolls before, this one feels off to use a combined 64th split burst like this.
*1:42.518 - fucking hell, please watch that left hand bias lmao
*1:50.029 - 209bpm 24th minijack is a strong oof. Please reorient this to not make this a minijack somewhere, this is a bit much.
*2:03.713 - Has the same deal as 1:50.029, in fact I think this sounds closer to 32nd than using 2 consecutive 48ths.
2:22.026 - Watch that column 1 minijack, near the end of the file this is kinda troll-ish to include that.

Most of the *'d points are what really suffer to the detriment of playability and enjoyability, even though it plays okay with some considerations. As it is this needs more work on addressing those key points I've mentioned. [6/10]